Orthodontic Tooth Movement

6

Review clinical trials related to Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Micro-osteoperforation Versus Photobiomodulation Therapy for Accelerating Maxillary Canine Retraction

Orthodontic treatment often requires moving the upper canine teeth (the pointed teeth) into the spaces left after removing premolar teeth. This process is usually slow and can take many months, making the total treatment time longer.This study will compare two techniques that may speed up this tooth movement: Micro-osteoperforation (MOP): A minimally invasive procedure in which a small device is used to create tiny holes in the jawbone near the canine tooth under local anesthesia. These micro-perforations stimulate the bone to remodel faster, which allows the tooth to move more quickly. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) / Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT): A painless, non-invasive technique that uses a low-power laser light applied to the gum tissue near the canine tooth. The laser energy stimulates cells in the bone and supporting tissues to accelerate tooth movement without any cutting or drilling. This trial will randomly assign eligible patients into one of three groups: MOP, LLLT, or a control group receiving standard orthodontic treatment only. Each group will contain 25 participants (75 total). The main goal is to measure and compare how fast the upper canine tooth moves in each group over the first month and until the space is fully closed. The study will also measure the effect of age and sex on the results. The findings will help orthodontists choose the best, fastest, and most comfortable method for each patient to shorten overall treatment time

Participants needed: 75
Trial details
Age: 18-40Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Kufa UniversityUpdated: Jun 18, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Age 18 to 40 years at the time of enrollment [+8]

Systemic diseases affecting bone metabolism including osteoporosis, osteopenia,... [+12]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Comparison of Rate of Tooth Movement Between MOPs vs MOPs & LLLT Combined

Orthodontic treatment is often prolonged, requiring years to achieve desirable outcomes. The prolonged duration of treatment increases the risk of complications such as root resorption, periodontal damage, and patient non-compliance. To address these concerns, various methods have been explored to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement, including pharmacological agents, mechanical vibration, corticotomies, and minimally invasive techniques like Micro-Osteoperforations (MOPs) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT). Micro-Osteoperforations (MOPs) have gained popularity as a minimally invasive technique that enhances bone remodeling by inducing a localized inflammatory response, thereby accelerating tooth movement. Studies have shown that MOPs can effectively stimulate the expression of cytokines, increasing osteoclastic activity and facilitating rapid orthodontic tooth movement. However, the extent of its effectiveness varies among individuals, necessitating additional interventions to maximize efficiency. Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT), also known as photobiomodulation, is another promising adjunct in orthodontics. LLLT has been reported to enhance cellular activity, promote osteoblastic and osteoclastic function, and improve tissue healing, leading to accelerated tooth movement. Several studies suggest that LLLT alone can expedite orthodontic treatment, but its combination with MOPs has not been extensively explored. This study aims to compare the rate of orthodontic tooth movement between MOPs alone and MOPs combined with LLLT. By evaluating these two techniques, this research seeks to determine whether LLLT enhances the effectiveness of MOPs in accelerating tooth movement. The findings of this study could provide valuable insights into optimizing orthodontic treatment duration while minimizing potential risks and discomfort for patients.

Participants needed: 33
Trial details
Age: 18-30Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Riphah International UniversityUpdated: Jun 4, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

• Patients aged 12-30 years requiring fixed orthodontic treatment. [+3]

• Patients with systemic conditions affecting bone metabolism (e.g., osteoporosi... [+2]

Status: Recruiting

Maxillary Incisor Intrusion Using Utility Arch Assisted With Micro-osteoperforations

Study will be directed to evaluate the dentoalveolar changes following maxillary incisor intrusion using utility arch assisted with micro-osteoperforations in deep bite cases.

Participants needed: 18
Trial details
Age: 15-25Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Al-Azhar UniversityUpdated: May 5, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Patients age between 15-25 years. [+4]

Skeletal discrepancies. [+7]

Status: Recruiting

Nano Coated Orthodontic Miniscrews for en Mass Retraction of the Upper Arch

study will be directed to evaluate silver-hydroxyapatite nano-coated versus uncoated orthodontic miniscrews for en masse retraction of the upper anterior segment.

Participants needed: 14
Trial details
Age: 14-20Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Al-Azhar UniversityUpdated: Apr 13, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Class I orthodontic cases with bimaxillary protrusion of the anterior segment of... [+4]

Patient with craniofacial anomalies (e.g, cleft lip and palate) [+4]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Clinical Evaluation of Local Calcitriol Delivery on Maxillary Canine Retraction

This study will evaluate the effect of locally applied Calcitriol on dental and skeletal changes during upper canine retraction. It is a split-mouth randomized clinical trial, where Calcitriol will be locally applied on one side of the maxilla, and the other side will serve as control.

Participants needed: 22
Trial details
Age: 13-35Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Al-Azhar UniversityUpdated: Oct 1, 2025
Eligibility criteria

Presence of class I malocclusion requiring bilateral extraction of the maxillary... [+4]

History of chronic systemic disease. [+5]

Status: Recruiting

Effect of MOPs During Orthodontic Movement in Periodontitis Patients

Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) cause cortical bone injuries and consequently increase the expression of inflammatory mediators, allowing for increased bone and periodontal ligament remodeling associated with orthodontic movement. It remains unclear the effect of orthodontic intrusion combined with MOPs application on teeth with reduced periodontium. The general objective will be to determine the efficacy of MOPs during orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) in terms of periodontal and orthodontic outcomes in stage IV periodontitis patients, case type 2 with pathological tooth migration (PTM), characterized the presence of at least one flared tooth of the upper-anterior sextant with an intrabony defect (intrabony component \<5mm)

Participants needed: 28
Trial details
Age: 18-80Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Universidad Complutense de MadridUpdated: Mar 27, 2025Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

adult patients older than 18-year-old; [+1]

diagnosed as stage IV (Papapanou et al., 2018) case-type 2 (Herrera et al. 2022)... [+9]