Pancreatectomy

Individuals with diabetes secondary to pancreatectomy experience impaired quality of life, partly due to the challenges of managing highly variable blood glucose levels. Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, widely evaluated in type 1 diabetes, may improve both metabolic outcomes and quality of life in this population. A review of the literature identified a few observational studies reporting promising results with HCL systems in the context of post-pancreatectomy diabetes. Only one randomized trial has evaluated AID in this population, showing excellent outcomes, but using a complex bihormonal system that is not yet commercially available worldwide. Consequently, there remains a lack of confirmatory evidence regarding the efficacy of commercially available monohormonal HCL systems in individuals with diabetes secondary to pancreatectomy, evidence that is crucial to support broader access to this technology. The intervention will consist in a 3-month AID treatment combining MiniMed 780 and Simplera. The control period will consist in 3 months using the Simplera for continuous glucose monitoring, alongside participant usual diabetes treatment. The primary outcome is the percentage of time that interstitial glucose levels remain within the target range (70-180 mg/dL), as measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM, Simplera), over a 3-month period using the MiniMed 780 hybrid closed-loop system, compared to a 3-month period under the participant's usual diabetes treatment.

This study will examine how removal of part or all of the pancreas affects blood sugar control, metabolism, and clinical outcomes over time. The study will include adults without diabetes before surgery who undergo pancreatic surgery as part of routine clinical care at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS. Researchers will study whether participants develop diabetes after surgery and whether this risk changes according to the type of pancreatic resection. Information from routine clinical care, metabolic tests, imaging, and pancreatic tissue samples collected during surgery may be used for research analyses.

This study will examine how removal of part or all of the pancreas affects blood sugar control, metabolism, and clinical outcomes over time. The study will include adults with diabetes before surgery who undergo pancreatic surgery as part of routine clinical care at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS. Researchers will study whether glycemic control worsens after surgery and whether this risk changes according to the type of pancreatic resection. The study will also examine changes in glucose metabolism, and cancer-related outcomes. Information from routine clinical care, metabolic tests, imaging, and pancreatic tissue samples collected during surgery may be used for research analyses.

Caring for people with pancreatic cancer requires good coordination between hospital care and care at home, with different healthcare professionals working closely together. Patients are also becoming more involved in managing their own care on a daily basis. However, this active involvement can be difficult if there is poor communication with healthcare teams, differences in skills or familiarity with digital tools, or systems that do not support patient participation. The PancreasPlus app was developed to support patients and caregivers by providing reliable information, self-monitoring tools, and a communication channel with healthcare professionals. The study aims to assess the feasibility, patient engagement, and perceived quality of routine use of the app. It is hypothesized that its use will improve engagement, perceived quality, reduce anxiety and unplanned hospital visits, without introducing technological or privacy risks. The app supports information and data collection but does not replace clinical decision-making. Objectives Primary objectives: Assess feasibility and patient engagement through questionnaire completion. Evaluate perceived service quality using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Secondary objectives: Monitor unplanned hospital visits and adherence to chemotherapy. Assess anxiety (HADS-A), nutritional status, and global quality of life (PROMIS Global). Evaluate usability and acceptability of the app (SUS, UTAUT2 short version). Endpoints Primary endpoints include questionnaire completion rates and perceived quality (CSQ-8 score). Secondary endpoints include unplanned hospital access, chemotherapy adherence, anxiety levels, nutritional status, quality of life, and app usability/acceptability. Methods This is a prospective, interventional, multicenter study with consecutive enrollment of eligible patients. Each participant will be followed for 3 months, with most activities conducted remotely via the app. At baseline (T0), patients receive study information, provide consent, undergo training, register in the app, and complete initial assessments (clinical, socio-demographic, PROMIS Global, HADS-A). At 12 weeks (W12), follow-up includes all outcome questionnaires and data on unplanned hospital visits. The app includes features such as a personal diary (symptoms, weight, BMI, appointments), interactive questionnaires with tailored feedback, and educational content on nutrition, prevention, emotional support, and patient rights. Population Inclusion criteria: adults (≥18 years) with pancreatic cancer, access to a smartphone/tablet (or caregiver support), ability to consent, and understanding of Italian. Exclusion criteria include severe cognitive impairment, inability to use the app or complete follow-up, or withdrawal of consent. Sample Size and Analysis A total of 185 patients will be enrolled (accounting for 10% dropout), based on an expected 70% engagement rate. Analyses will be conducted on both intention-to-observe and per-protocol populations. Engagement will be analyzed as questionnaire completion rates, while other outcomes will be analyzed using appropriate statistical models (e.g., logistic regression, ANCOVA, descriptive statistics). An interim analysis at 50% enrollment is planned to address potential low engagement.

The goal of this randomized non-inferiority clinical trial is to evaluate whether routine postoperative insulin infusion can be safely omitted in preoperative non-diabetic adult patients undergoing pancreatectomy for periampullary or pancreatic tumors. The primary purpose is to determine whether withholding insulin infusion provides comparable glycemic control while reducing treatment-related burden and adverse events. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does omission of postoperative insulin infusion result in non-inferior mean blood glucose levels through postoperative day (POD) 3 compared to standard insulin infusion? * Does omission of insulin infusion reduce the incidence of hypoglycemia without increasing postoperative complications, including surgical site infection within 3 months? Researchers will compare a no-insulin infusion group (intervention arm) with a standard insulin infusion group (control arm) to determine whether avoiding routine insulin infusion maintains comparable glycemic control while improving safety and patient comfort. Participants will: * Undergo pancreatectomy and be randomly assigned (1:1) to either receive standard insulin infusion or no routine insulin infusion postoperatively * Have blood glucose monitored using intermittent testing and continuous glucose monitoring (flash glucose monitoring system) * Receive protocol-based glycemic management, including rescue insulin if hyperglycemia occurs or discontinuation if hypoglycemia develops * Be followed for up to 3 months postoperatively to assess glycemic outcomes, hypoglycemic events, surgical site infection, and other postoperative complications * Complete a questionnaire assessing discomfort related to glucose monitoring and insulin administration This study aims to establish evidence-based postoperative glucose management strategies for non-diabetic patients undergoing pancreatectomy.

The goal of this study is to learn if urine trypsinogen can be used to diagnose post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Participants will have their urine measured by dipsticks during and after their surgery.

The goal of this clinical trial is to analyze if intraperitoneal drainage is necessary following distal pancreatectomy. This study aims to determine whether the omission of routine intraperitoneal drainage in the setting of reinforced staple technology is non-inferior to routine intraperitoneal drainage with respect to a composite post-operative complications of Grade B or C Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), readmission, or organ space surgical site infection following a distal pancreatectomy.

Recent evidence suggests that postoperative hyperamylasemia (POH) is a predictor of morbidity after pancreatectomy. This is based on the assumption that pancreatitis after pancreatectomy (PPAP) is a major trigger for the development of complications and is indicated by hyperamylasemia. Standardized prospective analysis and correlation with other laboratory parameters, hasn't been performed to date. Therefore the overall study aims are: * To prospectively evaluate the incidence and assess the clinical value of biochemical changes for the postoperative course. * To confirm and improve the definition and classification of postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) and to provide knowledge for effective early management of complications.

To assess the efficacy of complete covering using retromesenteric omentoplasty vs. partial covering or no covering of peripancreatic arteries in decreasing incidence of grade B+C post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), i.e. treated by transfusion and / or radiological or surgical hemostasis after PD in patients with high risk of POPF.

The goal of this observational study is to determine how often lymph node metastases occur in the splenic hilum and surrounding fat in patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer. The main question the study aims to answer is: Is spleen removal necessary in all cases, or is the risk of lymph node metastases in the fat around the spleen low enough to reconsider this standard practice? Currently, spleen removal is part of the standard treatment for patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer to ensure that any potential lymph node metastases in the surrounding fat are also removed. However, the likelihood of metastases in this area is low, and spleen removal carries risks. This study is a first step toward changing the treatment approach. If the findings show that metastases in the fat around the spleen are rare, the next step will be a randomized trial to further investigate whether spleen removal is necessary.

The DIPLOMA-3 trial is an international, multicenter, patient-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted left-sided pancreatectomy. Patients with an indication for elective left-sided pancreatecomy for benign or premalignant lesions in the body or tail of the pancreas and considered eligible will be randomized between laparoscopic and robot-assisted resection.

NORPACT-3 is a nationwide, Norwegian single arm prospective study that evaluates the resectability rates and survival in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer who received primary chemotherapy. Eligible patients are treated with primary chemotherapy possibly followed by surgical exploration and resection. All Norwegian centres performing pancreatic surgery have agreed to collaborate in this trial. The assignment of the medical intervention is not at the discretion of the investigator, but follow the national Norwegian guidelines regarding diagnostic work up, oncological and surgical treatment and follow up. The primary aim is a national resection rate of 50% in BRPC and 15% in LAPC in patients initiating primary chemotherapy, with adequate overall survival and morbidity/mortality (after resection median overall survival of 24 months, 1 year survival 80%, and 5 year survival \>20% + 90 day postoperative mortality ≤5%, 90-day postoperative major morbidity (Clavien Dindo grade 3) ≤40%).

This study assesses whether patients with pancreatic cancer who undergo surgery experience improved outcomes following the implementation of a multidisciplinary care pathway, specifically an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. This pathway includes various interventions in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care of these patients, all aimed at enhancing their health status and postoperative results.

The goal of this multicenter randomized controlled phase III trial is to compare two durations of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) with mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel (GnP) before attempt for surgical resection in patients with borderline (BR) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients with histologically confirmed non-metastatic BR/LAPC evaluated to potentially tolerate any of the treatment regimens and pancreatic surgery will be randomized to receive either standard duration NAT with 6 cycles mFOLFIRINOX or 4 cycles GnP or prolonged duration NAT with either 12 cycles mFOLFIRINOX or 6 cycles GnP before attempt for surgical resection, provided there is no evidence of disease progression. The primary objective is to compare the overall survival at 24 months after randomization of all treated patients and among the resected patients with BR/LAPC.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the type of surgical effect on pancreas transection. The main questions aims to answer are: * 1\. does pancreas preserving able to decrease incidence of postoperative diabeters * 2\. what is cause of major cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in pancreas transection