Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)

Multiple sclerosis (MS), the main central nervous system autoimmune disorder, is the first cause of non-traumatic disability in young adults and has thus significant individual consequences with elevated public health cost. It commonly starts during the third and fourth decades. Over the last twenty years, several disease-modifying therapies with variable benefit/risk profiles have been introduced leading to dramatic changes in the prognosis of MS. First, several moderately effective therapies , with good safety profile, have allowed to decrease the frequency of relapses along with a possible, albeit limited, effect on medium- and long-term disability. More recently highly effective therapies (HET), with immunosuppressive properties, have dramatically reduced clinical and MRI disease activity and significantly improved patient's prognosis. Anti-CD20 therapies (B-cells depleting therapies, given either intravenous or subcutaneous), one of the main HET, have demonstrated higher efficacy than platform therapies in several phase 3 randomized clinical trials and their use within the very first years of the disease seems to be associated with improved long-term outcomes. Taking all of this into account, the investigators hypothesize that RRMS patients who experience a de-escalation from anti-CD20 therapies to platform therapies after 40 years will not experience disease activity accrual and disability worsening.

The exploratory ELIOS study aims to assess the value of novel investigational Eye Movement Biomarkers (EMBs) in tracking disease-related changes among a real-world cohort of Canadian patients with active RRMS, within the context of disease-modifying treatment (i.e., ofatumumab). To that end, the study will use the patented investigational, Eye Tracking Neurological Assessment (ETNA-ProgMS) SaMD (v1.0.11 or later), which has not yet received Health Canada approval, to reliably and accurately track eye movements with precision.

This study, iPROACT-MS, is part of the iPROACT group of clinical trials aiming to investigate the effects of oral supplementation with indole-3-propionic acid (IPA) in humans. IPA is naturally produced as a gut bacterial metabolite with the amino acid tryptophan as substrate. The primary aim of iPROACT-MS is to investigate whether patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) can benefit from supplementation with IPA. The hypothesis is that supplementation with IPA will protect against MS-related disease activity, neurodegeneration and metabolic abnormalities. Secondary, iPROACT-MS aims at elucidating the complex relationships between lifestyle, gut microbial factors, inflammation, oxidative stress, metabolic health, MS disease severity and MS disease activity.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety profile, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of BCD-281 and the reference drug in subjects with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by loss of motor and sensory function, that results from immune-mediated inflammation, demyelination and subsequent axonal damage. It is the most common cause of neurological disability in young adults, involving a long-term therapeutic follow-up. 85% of the patients are diagnosed with Relapsing-Remitting form of MS (RRMS). This form is characterized by clearly defined acute or subacute neurological symptoms (relapses) followed by periods of partial to complete recovery. Disease-modifying therapies (DMT) used to treat RRMS are immunomodulatory or suppressor molecules which have proven efficacy in limiting disease activity (decreasing relapse rate and delaying time to disease progression). However, the long-term safety of DMT is uncertain, as there is an increased risk of developing adverse events or infections (sometimes severe) such as observed in the last pandemic of COVID-19 (higher risk of infection), highlighting the need to reassess the benefit/risk ratio of maintaining immunomodulatory or suppressive therapy in the MS population. In elderly patients with comorbidity, this risk is further increased. To date, few studies on the discontinuation of treatment in elderly RRMS patients have been conducted. However, those available demonstrate that there was no difference in relapse rates between patients who continued or discontinued treatment. These results are consistent with immunosenescence studies in RRMS that suggested a negative correlation between relapse rate/inflammatory processes and age. On the contrary, there is evidence indicating a positive correlation between age and the number of infections. In addition, in the current context in France, it is important to take into account the medico-social cost associated with long-term treatments. In France, the average estimated annual cost per patient is 12,000€, more than half of which is attributed to medications.Furthermore, with age progression, an inversion of the benefit/cost assessment has been observed in treated patients. Considering these medical and medico-social factors, it is reasonable to question the value of continuing treatment in stable patients with RRMS over 55 years. This is a randomized, controlled, multicentric, open-label, parallel groups, 1:1 ratio non-inferiority clinical trial, comparing (1) a group that will stop treatment, to (2) a group that will continue treatment, over the course of 2 years, to determine the survival rate without MS activity defined clinically or by imaging. The patients in both arms will be followed over 2 years after randomization. 5 visits will be performed for all patients: inclusion/randomization visit (M0) and 4 follow-up visits every 6 months (M6, M12, M18, and M24). An additional phone call at M3 is planned.

This project is to: 1. Quantify differences in axonal integrity and organization in aMS versus naPMS patients. 2. Quantify changes in axonal integrity and organization in aMS versus naPMS patients over a two-year period. 3. Validate the combination of imaging parameters that best differentiate aMS versus naPMS patients using histopathology.