Renal Stone

The use of FANS has changed the operative landscape of RIRS by allowing continuous active suction-assisted clearance of ablated stone material in real time. Use of fragmentation technique in FANS requires high-energy to reduce stone burden into small fragments, followed by active suction of residual fine material. Dusting with FANS, on the other hand, converts the entire stone volume into sub-millimetre particulate that is continuously suctioned away during lasing potentially offering a more streamlined workflow with potentially less energy usage, reduced mechanical stress on the ureteroscope working channel, and fewer scope withdrawals. The combination of TFL dusting with FANS-assisted real-time evacuation may produce stone-free outcomes equivalent or superior to fragmentation, while offering these additional operative efficiencies. Whether dusting using TFL with FANS is non-inferior or indeed superior to fragmentation using TFL with FANS in terms of stone-free rate at one month has not been evaluated in prospective randomised trial yet. This study aims to answer that specific question in patients with renal stone less than 2 cm.

This is a phase I feasibility study to investigate the use of a novel intelligent robotic retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) platform. The TaloStone T1000 RIRS system can manipulate the flexible ureteroscope, with remote control of the instruments (laser fibre or basket) and ureteral access sheath movements. Beyond teleoperation, the TaloStone T1000 RIRS system integrates AI perception models and decision-making algorithms to enable the supervised autonomous execution of critical tasks within the RIRS workflow.

The study's aim is to determine which treatment modality, either ESWL or RIRS, is more effective in achieving stone clearance for lower calyceal calculi. Investigators hypothesize that retrograde intrarenal surgery is better as compared to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. It will target those patients suffering from kidney stones in lower calyces with sizes up to 1.5 cm in an open-label, randomized controlled trial.

this study aims to compare between efficacy of erector spinae plane block and conventional multimodal analgesia in Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

This is a prospective randomized clinical trial which aims to compare the clinical outcomes of robotic flexible ureteroscopy and standard flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of renal stones.

The primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser using low and high power settings. Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of stone free rates, laser time, laser activation patterns, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Patients ≥ 18 years with renal stones (8-25 mm) scheduled for ureteroscopic lithotripsy at the Day Surgery Clinic at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Norway, are eligible for inclusion in the study. After written consent and inclusion, patients are randomised to laser lithotripsy using either low power settings (Group 1: 4-6 Watt, short pulse mode) or high power settings (Group 2: 16-18 Watt, short pulse mode). The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in general anaesthesia using a standardised technique. All patients are followed up with a low dose CT scan 3 months post endoscopically to assess stone free status as well as a consultation at the outpatient clinic. Results and data for the two randomisation groups are compared according to the aims of the study.

This is an observational, international, multicenter, cohort study, prospectively collecting clinical data registry on consecutive patients with urinary stone undergoing ECIRS.

The ureteral access sheath (UAS) is an ancillary device widely used by urologists to facilitate fast, repeatable, and safe access to ureters and collecting systems; improve visibility; reduce the risk of infection by reducing intrarenal pressure; and protect ureters and scopes when extracting multiple stones during surgery. Insertion of ureteric access sheath may be difficult due to tight ureter, so sometimes preoperative stenting might be needed. Silodosin is an α1A adrenoceptor with high affinity and selectivity for the ureteric muscle, which may reduce ureteral spasm. Oral a1-blockers can reduce intraureteral pressure, and may reduce maximal ureteral access sheath insertion force.¹ Preoperative silodosin protects against significant ureteral injury related to UAS insertion during fURS and decreases postoperative pain level. Silodosin premedication might be an effective and safe technique to replace prestenting.²