Clinical trials

The aim of the study is to compare clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) monotherapy versus dual antithrombotic therapy (DOAC plus clopidogrel) in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

This study aims to compare late-lumen loss (LLL) between DCB and DES to treat de novo coronary artery stenosis by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

To compare clinical outcomes of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) according to the coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT), invasive and non-invasive coronary physiologic assessment.

The aim of the study is to compare clinical outcomes between optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

The goal of this multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial is to learn whether norepinephrine or dopamine is more effective and safer as the first-line vasoactive drug for treating cardiogenic shock in adults. Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition in which the heart cannot pump enough blood to supply the body. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Does norepinephrine reduce the risk of death or worsening cardiogenic shock compared with dopamine? Does norepinephrine lead to fewer complications such as arrhythmias, the need for mechanical circulatory support, or cardiac arrest? Researchers will compare norepinephrine and dopamine to see which drug better stabilizes blood pressure, improves tissue perfusion, and prevents progression of shock during the early phase of treatment. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to receive either norepinephrine or dopamine as the first vasoactive drug Receive treatment and monitoring based on current clinical guidelines for cardiogenic shock Undergo regular assessments of blood pressure, laboratory values, heart rhythm, and organ function during hospitalization Be followed for outcomes at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after enrollment This study aims to provide evidence that will help determine which initial vasoactive drug offers better outcomes for patients with cardiogenic shock and guide future treatment recommendations.

Many patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD), which is associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, there have been few studies regarding revascularization strategy in patients with NSTEMI and MVD. Therefore, we planned to perform prospective, open-label, randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immediate complete revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention \[PCI\] for both infarct-related artery \[IRA\] and non-IRA during index PCI) compared to staged PCI strategy of non-IRA (PCI for IRA followed by non-IRA PCI after several days). PCI procedure at non-IRA with diameter stenosis between 50 and 69% should be conducted with the aid of fractional flow reserve (FFR), and non-IRA with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% will be revascularized without FFR.

Study objectives: To determine the optimal timing of coronary angiography (CAG) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) complicated by acute decompensated heart failure (AHF). The primary objective of this trial is to test the hypothesis that immediate CAG ≤2 hours after establishment of NSTEMI diagnosis would result in a significant reduction in primary composite outcome of death from any cause, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or hospitalization for heart failure (HF) at 12 months after randomization as compared with delayed CAG after stabilization. Study hypothesis: Immediate CAG ≤2 hours after establishment of NSTEMI diagnosis would result in a significant reduction in primary composite outcome of death from any cause, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or hospitalization for heart failure (HF) at 12 months after randomization as compared with delayed CAG after stabilization. Background: Although current guidelines recommend early CAG within 2 hours for patients with NSTEMI complicated by AHF, many patients with NSTEMI complicated by AHF did not receive early CAG. However, no randomized clinical trials have evaluated the optimal timing of CAG in patients with NSTEMI complicated by AHF. Therefore, the investigators aimed to perform a prospective, investigator-initiated, open-label, muilticenter trial to compare the efficacy and safety between immediate CAG (CAG \<2 hours after establishment of NSTEMI diagnosis) and delayed CAG after stabilization (i.e. improved dyspnea and disappearance of pulmonary congestion) in participants with NSTEMI complicated by AHF. Study procedure: Following the establishment of NSTEMI diagnosis, participants fulfilling the eligibility criteria will be randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to immediate CAG ≤2 hours after randomization or delayed CAG after stabilization on another day during hospitalization.

Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) is a rare but vision-threatening vascular disorder that is commonly caused by embolic events originating from the heart or carotid arteries. Patients with RAO are known to have an increased risk of subsequent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, including ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction. However, long-term outcomes and optimal medical treatment strategies for these patients remain insufficiently characterized. The purpose of this nationwide population-based study is to investigate the incidence of long-term cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes in patients diagnosed with retinal artery occlusion using the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database. In addition, the study aims to evaluate the impact of various medical therapies, including antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, and statins, on long-term clinical outcomes.

To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA), intravascular imaging, or invasive physiologic assessment.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a Artificial Intelligence integrated Mixed Reality-based High-Alert Medications Management Simulation Program (AIMR-HAM) helps hospital nurses manage high-alert medicines (HAMs) more safely. MR mixes real and virtual elements to let nurses practice in realistic scenarios. The main questions are: Does the AIMR-HAM improve nurses' medication safety skills? Does the AIMR-HAM lower medication errors and improve clinical performance? Researchers will compare two groups to answer these questions: Intervention group: AIMR-HAM Control group: standard education only Who can take part: Nurses who work at large hospitals and have 1 to 6 years of clinical experience. About 60 nurses will join the study. What participants will do: Attend the assigned training (AIMR-HAM or standard education only). Complete short tests and surveys before and after training to measure skills, communication, and clinical reasoning. Report any medication errors that occur during the study. Why this matters: The study will show whether AIMR-HAM training can improve how nurses handle HAMs and make patient care safer.

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the short (12 week) and long-term (1-year) efficacy and the tolerability between stepwise psychopharmacotherapy and antidepressant monotherapy for 12 weeks in adult patients with major depressive disorders, stratified by the multimodal serum biomarker scores.

The study was designed as single-country, multi-center, open-labelled, randomized (1:1), phase II trial. 238 patients with medically and technically operable advanced gastric adenocarcinoma in middle or distal 1/3 of stomach are enrolled and randomly assigned to laparoscopic gastrectomy group and open gastrectomy group. 4 cycles of mFLOT chemotherapy will be conducted before and after gastrectomy. The primary objective of this study is comparison of D2 lymph node dissection compliance rate between open surgery group and laparoscopic surgery group after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.