Clinical trials

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the addition of adenosine to standard cardioplegia improves myocardial protection in adult patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery. The study population includes adult patients of both sexes undergoing elective cardiac procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest. The main questions this trial aims to answer are: Does the addition of adenosine to cardioplegia affect myocardial protection as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)? What is the effect of adenosine on biochemical markers of myocardial injury, such as postoperative high-sensitivity troponin levels? What is the effect of adenosine on perioperative hemodynamic support requirements, as quantified by the Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS)? Researchers will compare patients receiving adenosine-supplemented cardioplegia with those receiving standard cardioplegia (placebo) to assess differences in echocardiographic indicators of myocardial protection, biomarker release, and need for vasoactive/inotropic support. Participants will: Receive either adenosine-supplemented cardioplegia (adenosine 1.2 mmol/L; 24 mg) or placebo according to randomization. Undergo standard perioperative monitoring during cardiac surgery. Undergo intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to evaluate myocardial protection by comparing pre- and post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) measurements. Have postoperative laboratory testing for high-sensitivity troponin at baseline, 2h, 12h, and 24h after clamp release. Have hemodynamic support requirements recorded and VIS calculated at the end of surgery and at 12h and 24h postoperatively. Be followed for perioperative clinical outcomes including arrhythmias, need for cardioversion or mechanical circulatory support, ICU/hospital length of stay, myocardial infarction, and mortality.

In this study, we aim to evaluate the incidence of hypotension during vasopressin weaning by comparing two methods - titrated reduction versus abrupt withdrawal - through the conduct of a randomized clinical trial.

This prospective observational cohort study aims to validate an artificial intelligence (AI) tool designed for pre-anesthetic assessment in Portuguese, tailored to the Brazilian healthcare context. Conducted at a single tertiary hospital, the study will enroll 270 adult patients (aged \>18 years) scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgeries. Participants will use the AI tool to complete a self-assessment, generating general patient guidance and a detailed medical evaluation (the latter withheld from the anesthesiologist). A standard pre-anesthetic evaluation will then be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the AI results. A third blinded anesthesiologist will compare the assessments for accuracy, consistency, and risk identification (e.g., ASA classification and perioperative risk models). Primary outcome is concordance between AI and human assessments using Cohen's Kappa. Secondary outcomes include anesthesiologist perceptions of the tool's utility, impact on assessment quality, and patient usability challenges. The study poses minimal risks, with data collected over 24 months, and aims to enhance perioperative safety and efficiency in Brazil.

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) are among the main complications after the anesthetic-surgical procedure. It can be said that thoracic surgery results in impaired respiratory function in the postoperatively, due to the decrease in lung volumes and capacities (the vital capacity decreases by approximately 50-60% and functional residual capacity decreases by approximately 30% in the first 24 hours after surgery) diaphragm dysfunction, gas exchange impaired, cough and ineffective mucociliary clearance. Thus, our hypothesis is that the application of preoperative risk scores normally used for non-cardiac and non-thoracic surgeries may be effective on the predictability of the occurrence of CPP in patients undergoing ventilation single-lung. This is a prospective observational study in order to evaluate the performance of the ASA, ARISCAT and LAS VEGAS risk scores for predict the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) in patients undergoing thoracic surgery with single-lung ventilation.

Patients at risk of significant intraoperative blood loss and/or potential hemodynamic instability often necessitate the placement of two or more central venous catheters, including large bore catheters. In tertiary hospitals, anesthesiologists frequently encounter patients undergoing major surgeries such as liver transplantation, lung transplantation, cardiac surgery, and vascular surgery, who require multiple central venous punctures as part of routine anesthetic management. However, most review and consensus articles do not directly address the utilization of multiple catheters in the same venous site, nor establish formal recommendations regarding this practice. The latest consensus on central venous access from the American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA), published in 2012, briefly touches upon some aspects related to this practice but does not outline any contraindications. Thus, the investigators have identified a gap in evidence and robust prospective studies addressing the use of more than one catheter in the same site for central venous access. This lacuna underscores the importance of conducting a controlled clinical study in our institutions to establish the efficacy and safety of this approach in the perioperative context. The present study aims to evaluate the incidence of mechanical complications (such as dysrhythmias, arterial puncture, hematoma, pneumothorax/hemothorax, insertion failure, or inadequate positioning) within the first 24 hours after double puncture of the internal jugular vein compared to puncture of two distinct central vessels, in patients undergoing multiple central venous accesses during major surgeries. This study will be designed as a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority, open, parallel clinical trial with two groups for patient allocation. Patients identified for multiple central venous accesses as part of preoperative anesthetic planning will be randomly allocated to either receive two central venous accesses in two separate sites (Group I or control group) or two concurrent central venous accesses in a single internal jugular vein (Group II or intervention group). Only adult patients classified as ASA I to IV (over 18 years old), scheduled for major surgery, will be eligible for inclusion.