Clinical trials

This is a single-center, observational study including a retrospective cohort and a prospective validation cohort. The study aims to identify independent risk factors for inflammatory ureteral polyps in patients with ureteral calculi and develop a preoperative predictive model. The retrospective part will analyze clinical and imaging data of patients treated at the First Hospital of Jilin University between 2018 and 2025. The prospective part is currently recruiting participants to validate the model. The primary outcome is the intraoperative diagnosis of inflammatory ureteral polyps.

Gastric cancer is a common type of cancer that often spreads to the liver. When cancer spreads to the liver, treatment becomes very difficult. Many patients will undergo chemotherapy to shrink the tumor. Currently, doctors use CT or MRI scans to assess the effect of chemotherapy, but these examinations usually take about 2 months to show changes in the size of the tumor. The purpose of this study is to test whether a special type of ultrasound technology called "contrast-enhanced subharmonic ultrasound" can help doctors determine earlier whether chemotherapy is effective compared to conventional scans. This ultrasound detection does not use radiation and can display the blood perfusion status inside liver tumors. We will observe the changes in blood flow perfusion inside the tumor before the start of treatment and after 1-2 chemotherapy cycles to see if these changes can predict whether chemotherapy will be effective in the future. If this test is effective, it will help doctors adjust the treatment plan more quickly, which may improve the treatment effect for gastric cancer patients whose cancer cells have spread to the liver, and also help identify patients who are not responding to chemotherapy as early as possible, reducing the side effects and economic burden of patients.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignant tumor worldwide, with a significantly increased incidence among patients with liver diseases. Even if HCC can be treated by surgical resection and ablation, the 5-year recurrence rate is as high as 50-70%. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), released by the American College of Radiology (ACR), is a classification management system specifically designed to evaluate liver lesions in high-risk HCC patients. Since its release in 2011, the CT/MRI LI-RADS has been updated to the 2018 version. Subsequently, the CEUS LI-RADS was introduced in 2016 and updated in 2017. The CEUS LI-RADS standard has relatively high specificity but lacks sensitivity. The ESCULAP (Erlanger Synopsis of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at Risk) standard proposed by Schellhaas et al. in Germany has high sensitivity in diagnosing HCC in patients with liver diseases . However, there is currently a lack of research on the diagnostic efficacy of these two standards for the re-discovery of liver space-occupying lesions in patients with a history of HCC. This study aims to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the two standards for recurrent HCC in patients with a history of HCC.

This study aims to address the issue of a lack of individualized basis for selecting liver resection (LH) or microwave ablation (MWA) in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients to reduce the early recurrence rate (≤2 years). Given that existing machine learning-based recurrence prediction studies have failed to guide the optimal treatment plan selection, and that multidisciplinary consultations rely on guidelines (universality) and experience (subjectivity) which have their limitations, we propose to utilize artificial intelligence (AI), specifically the advantages of multimodal deep learning technology (which outperforms traditional machine learning by integrating complementary information to provide more accurate predictions), to establish a hybrid deep learning model that integrates contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. This model will predict the probability of early recurrence (ER≤2 years) in patients and, based on this, recommend LH or MWA as the optimal first treatment option for newly diagnosed early HCC patients to optimize individualized treatment decisions.

Colorectal cancer is a common type of cancer that often spreads to the liver. When cancer spreads to the liver, treatment becomes very difficult. Many patients will undergo chemotherapy to shrink the tumor. Currently, doctors use CT or MRI scans to assess the effect of chemotherapy, but these examinations usually take about 2 months to show changes in the size of the tumor. The purpose of this study is to test whether a special type of ultrasound technology called "contrast-enhanced subharmonic ultrasound" can help doctors determine earlier whether chemotherapy is effective compared to conventional scans. This ultrasound detection does not use radiation and can display the blood perfusion status inside liver tumors. We will observe the changes in blood flow perfusion inside the tumor before the start of treatment and after 1-2 chemotherapy cycles to see if these changes can predict whether chemotherapy will be effective in the future. If this test is effective, it will help doctors adjust the treatment plan more quickly, which may improve the treatment effect for colon cancer patients whose cancer cells have spread to the liver, and also help identify patients who are not responding to chemotherapy as early as possible, reducing the side effects and economic burden of patients.

This study plans to find the most suitable lymph node cortex thickness and abnormal lymph node features to define suspicious lymph nodes. Then, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of axillary lymph nodes will be done, aiming to provide some guidance for the biopsy.

To evaluate the diagnostic value of the combined model of subharmonic-assisted pressure estimation (SHAPE), liver stiffness (LSM), and platelet count (PLT) for high-risk esophageal and gastric varices (HRV)

This international multicenter retrospective cohort study aims to externally validate the URSL Predictive Angle, a novel CT-derived morphometric parameter, as an imaging biomarker for predicting intraoperative conversion risk during transurethral ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) for ureteral calculi. Intraoperative conversion is defined as the unanticipated abandonment of the planned endoscopic approach due to unfavorable ureteral anatomy or stone impaction, necessitating recourse to open ureterolithotomy, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, or ureteral stent placement with planned staged secondary intervention. Such conversions are associated with protracted operative duration, heightened anesthetic exposure, and increased physical, psychological, and financial burdens on patients. The URSL Predictive Angle is a geometric parameter derived from preoperative coronal CT reformations that quantifies the degree of local ureteral angulation induced by an impacted calculus. Preliminary single-center data demonstrated robust predictive fidelity of this metric with an area under the ROC curve of 0.861 and an optimal discriminatory threshold of 131.8° yielding a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 88%. This study will enroll eligible patients from multiple domestic and international tertiary care hospitals who underwent URSL for ureteral calculi between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2025. The primary outcome is intraoperative conversion of surgical approach. The predictive performance of the URSL angle will be evaluated using ROC curve analysis with AUC calculation. Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression will be employed to address potential confounding. This study is registered as a patient registry with a cohort model. Data collection is retrospective, involving abstraction from electronic medical records, operative logs, and PACS. A waiver of informed consent has been requested based on the retrospective design, minimal risk determination, stringent anonymization procedures, and impracticability of obtaining individual consent.

This is a single-center, single-arm study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (those who have progressed on or are intolerant to first-line oxaliplatin-based regimens with or without targeted therapy) receiving Levofolinic Acid + 5-FU continuous infusion combined with irinotecan hydrochloride liposome ± cetuximab/bevacizumab. Approximately 30 patients will be enrolled.

This is an open-label, single-arm, Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-15-armored chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in subjects with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia.

Why is this study conducted? The purpose of this study is to improve the treatment efficacy, particularly the pathological complete response rate, in patients with high-risk/extremely high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In recent years, with the combination of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy, some progress has been made in the treatment of rectal cancer, but there are still problems of regional recurrence and distant metastasis. Therefore, developing new treatment strategies for these patients is particularly important. The treatment of rectal cancer usually involves surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The current treatment methods have gradually shifted towards neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy, and have shown good potential in some clinical trials. These studies suggest that combining short-range radiotherapy, anti angiogenic drugs, and immune checkpoint inhibitors may play an important role in improving patient prognosis and enhancing tumor response rates. However, the efficacy and safety of these plans in high-risk patients still need further validation. In this context, the aim of our study is to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by four cycles of CapeOX chemotherapy combined with toripalimab, with or without concurrent surufatinib, in patients with mid-to-low locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors identified by MRI (including any one or more of the following: cT4, cN2, EMVI+, MRF/CRM+, or lateral lymph node metastas. This study aims to promote treatment optimization for LARC patients and provide new ideas for future treatments. Why are you invited to participate in this study? We would like to invite you to participate in this study as you have been diagnosed with high-risk or extremely high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer, which meets the inclusion criteria of this study. Specifically, you need to meet the conditions for pathological diagnosis, have a suitable tumor location, and not have serious comorbidities or other excluded diseases (such as recurrent rectal cancer, cardiac dysfunction, etc.). The final selection will be determined by the research doctor based on your actual situation. What do you need to do to participate in this study? Participating in this study will require you to follow a series of steps. You need to undergo regular medical examinations and evaluations, including blood tests, imaging examinations, and anorectal function assessments. During the research period, you may also need to fill out a questionnaire and provide some biological samples (such as blood samples), which will be used for the analysis of drug efficacy. The frequency and specific content of each follow-up will be informed by the research team to ensure your participation throughout the entire treatment process. I hope you can cooperate with these research steps to help us better understand the effectiveness of this treatment plan. What are the risks of participating in this study? This study involves the use of neoadjuvant short course radiotherapy, PD-1 monoclonal antibody (Terizumab), and anti angiogenic therapy (Sofantinib). Participants may face the following risks: Risk of neoadjuvant short course radiotherapy: Participants may experience severe side effects (≥ grade 3), including but not limited to severe diarrhea, third degree neutropenia, and third degree radiation dermatitis. These side effects may seriously affect the quality of life of patients. Risk of PD-1 monoclonal antibody: Terriptylimab may cause immune related adverse reactions (irAEs), which can involve any organ. The commonly known irAEs include skin toxicity (such as papules and itching, with an incidence of 30% to 40%), diarrhea and/or colitis (8% to 19%), fatigue (16% to 24%), immune related hepatitis (5%), hypothyroidism (4% to 10%), and hyperthyroidism (4%). Overall, nearly two-thirds (about 2/3) of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy will experience varying degrees of irAEs, and the incidence of serious adverse events cannot be ignored. Risk of anti angiogenic therapy: The use of sorafenib may lead to adverse reactions related to its anti angiogenic and immunomodulatory effects. Known common adverse reactions include proteinuria, hypertension, bleeding, liver dysfunction, diarrhea, etc., with an incidence rate of over 20%. Among serious adverse events (≥ grade 3), hypertension (29.7%), proteinuria (14.5%), liver dysfunction (12.8%), and bleeding (4.5%) are the most common. In rare cases, treatment-related deaths may occur due to gastrointestinal bleeding, cerebral hemorrhage, etc. Handling of research related injuries? This study is an intervention study that does not add any additional risks beyond routine clinical diagnosis and treatment. If you suffer harm due to participating in the study, compensation or liability will be determined in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.

The effectiveness of Patellin ® antibacterial solution in treating persistent cervical HR-HPV infection

Imaging evaluation was performed every 3 months (± 7 days) from enrollment, and real-time examination was performed if new lesions were suspected. The study was divided into two parts: Part 1: Rexiacin capsules assist in the treatment phase of the TC regimen. Part 2: Rexiacin capsule combined with targeted drug maintenance therapy after the end of chemotherapy. The overall research cycle is roughly divided into screening period, treatment period, and follow-up period: Screening period: -7d\~0d, that is, after the signing of the informed consent form, the screening assessment must be completed within 7 days; Treatment period: 1 dosing cycle every 3 weeks; During chemotherapy, blood routine, liver and kidney function tests were performed every week, tumor marker monitoring and safety evaluation were performed every cycle, and imaging evaluations were performed every 3 months (± 7 days) to evaluate the efficacy. After the end of chemotherapy, the maintenance treatment period and follow-up stage will be conducted, and biochemical tests such as tumor markers, blood routine, liver and kidney function will be performed every 3 months (± 7 days), and imaging evaluation will be performed to evaluate the efficacy, and the patient's self-evaluation results will be evaluated (FOSI, EQ-5D-5L). Peripheral blood immune indicators: Peripheral blood TBNK+Treg lymphocyte subset typing and activated lymphocyte cytokines were performed every 6 months (± 7 days) to monitor the patient's immune status. Medication is administered until an event that meets the criteria for treatment termination occurs or the clinical trial is closed. Clinical tumor imaging evaluation was completed (the evaluation method was consistent before and after, enhanced CT or enhanced MRI was preferred). Investigational drug treatment should be continued until the occurrence of disease progression, or withdrawal due to intolerable toxicity, or receipt of new anti-tumor therapy, or withdrawal of informed consent and voluntary withdrawal for other reasons, or study termination, whichever occurs first. The termination time of the study is the last subject who has received the study drug for 1 year or all subjects are out of the group, whichever is achieved first. Follow-up period: If the investigator decides to end the subject's treatment with the study drug, then the treatment period will be considered the end of (End of Therapy, EOT). All subjects, including those who discontinue treatment for any reason (except for loss to follow-up, death, withdrawal of informed consent), will have an EOT visit scheduled within 7 days after the investigator decides to end the subject's treatment with study drug. The EOT visit should include vital signs, physical examination, laboratory tests, and clinical tumor imaging evaluation (first enhanced CT or enhanced MRI). Safety follow-up: Subjects are required to have a safety visit 30 days (+7 days) after the last dose. If the subject plans to receive a new anti-tumor treatment within 30 days after the last dose, a safety follow-up will be conducted before receiving the new anti-tumor therapy. Safety visits are required at the study center and should be performed to assess for AEs, concomitant medications, and concomitant treatments. Until adverse reactions related to the study drug disappear, or drop to Grade ≤1, or return to baseline levels, or stable or acceptable levels assessed by the investigator. Survival follow-up: After the safety follow-up, subjects will be followed up for survival once every 3 months (± 7 days), and will be followed up by telephone until death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of informed consent, or termination of the study.

This trial was designed as a single-arm, open-label, prospective clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy (ORR) and safety (AE incidence) of CapsuleX in combination with cisplatin for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC).

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore the difference in 3-year stoma-free survival between the Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis (TCA) surgery and the low anterior resection combined with protective stoma (LAR) surgery in patients with low rectal cancer, as well as the differences in anal function, surgical complications, and survival outcomes within 1 year after surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is TCA surgery superior to LAR surgery in improving the 3-year stoma-free survival of patients with low rectal cancer? 2. Are there differences in postoperative anal function (assessed by LARS score and Wexner score), quality of life (assessed by EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire), surgical complications, pathological outcomes, and long-term survival (disease-free survival, time to recurrence, overall survival) between the two surgical methods? Researchers will compare the TCA group and the LAR group to see if TCA surgery can reduce the permanent stoma rate, improve postoperative anal function and quality of life, and ensure surgical safety and favorable tumor-related outcomes compared with LAR surgery. Participants will: 1. Be randomly assigned to either the TCA group or the LAR group in a 1:1 ratio. 2. Receive the corresponding surgical intervention. 3. Complete regular follow-ups at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, and 36 after the first surgery. 4. Provide relevant clinical data (perioperative, pathological, follow-up) as required.

Acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) is a common but not fully understood organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. Current AGI grading systems rely primarily on clinical presentation and feeding tolerance, which are inherently subjective and may not accurately reflect the underlying biological severity of intestinal damage. Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) is a protein expressed almost exclusively in the cytoplasm of mature small intestinal epithelial cells. In cases of ischemia, inflammation, or mechanical injury, I-FABP is rapidly released into the bloodstream and subsequently excreted in the urine. These characteristics make I-FABP a highly specific biomarker for intestinal epithelial cell injury and intestinal ischemia. A prospective study combining paired blood and urine I-FABP measurements, standardized AGI assessment, and careful consideration of surgical status was conducted to elucidate the role of intestinal epithelial cell injury in acute gastrointestinal dysfunction.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the risk factors and prediction of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: Which clinical, surgical, and laboratory factors are associated with the development of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in lung cancer surgery patients, and can machine learning models accurately predict individual risk? Participants undergoing lung cancer surgery will be prospectively followed for 30 days after surgery. Perioperative clinical data, laboratory results, and imaging findings will be collected to identify VTE risk factors and to develop a predictive model.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the protein heterogeneity in extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from different human blood circulatory regions of patients with ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The main objectives are: Reveal the proteomic heterogeneity of EVs in different blood circulatory regions of the human body。 Reveal the proteomic differences of EVs in cerebral feeding arteries and draining veins between patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and those without hemorrhage. Explore EV-derived protein biomarkers that reflect the diagnosis and prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage

Nutritional support therapy is a crucial part of ICU patient care, as both malnutrition and overnutrition can lead to adverse clinical outcomes. Meticulous monitoring of nutritional support is essential. Unfortunately, to date, there are no biomarkers available to assess the appropriateness of nutritional support in the ICU setting. However, mounting evidence suggests that phenotypic analysis of patients using nutritional biomarkers or risk screening scores for adaptation may enhance our ability to characterize patients in terms of prognosis and likelihood of treatment response. This study aims to identify the trajectory patterns of prealbumin changes based on dynamic monitoring data of prealbumin during hospitalization of critically ill patients, and to analyze the Association between different trajectory groups and patient prognosis. In addition, this study will further analyze its Association with nutritional intake and nutritional indicators, thereby assessing the potential value of prealbumin change trajectories in terms of the adequacy and effectiveness of nutritional support for critically ill patients.

Severe pneumonia requires rapid and accurate diagnosis for targeted treatment, but single lung CT has limitations in identifying pathogens and distinguishing infectious/non-infectious etiologies. This is a retrospective self-controlled study enrolling patients diagnosed with severe pneumonia at the institution between 2024 and 2025 (recruitment will be extended 6-12 months if fewer than 400 patients are enrolled), all of whom underwent both single lung CT and bronchoscopy-combined CT examinations. Clinical data will be collected retrospectively, including demographic information, bronchoscopic mucosal findings (e.g., congestion, exudation), lung CT lesion characteristics (e.g., consolidation, ground-glass opacity), and gold standard diagnostic results (pathogenic detection or clinical comprehensive diagnosis). The core objective is to compare the diagnostic precision between single lung CT and bronchoscopy-combined CT, focusing on accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity across three etiological subtypes (bacterial/fungal, viral, non-infectious). Bronchoscopy complements CT by directly visualizing airway mucosal changes, while CT provides panoramic views of pulmonary lesions. Their combination is hypothesized to improve diagnostic accuracy. The findings aim to optimize diagnostic strategies for severe pneumonia, guiding clinicians to select more effective imaging approaches.

During the prone position, there may be an increase in intragastric pressure. The investigators focus on a scientific question: Whether reducing enteral nutrition before the prone position will benefit patients with severe mechanically ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The experimental group had the enteral nutrition dose reduced before the prone position, while the control group did not have the enteral nutrition dose reduced

Melanoma has emerged as the fastest-growing malignancy in recent years, with incidence and mortality rates among both men and women in East Asian countries exceeding the Asian average. China ranks fifth among East Asian nations in melanoma incidence. Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors are achieving significant breakthroughs in adjuvant melanoma therapy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with PD-L1-positive, completely resectable mucosal melanoma, thereby providing additional clinical evidence for treatment decisions.

This study aims to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of different early urinary catheter removal strategies following radical resection of mid-low rectal cancer. Current clinical practice faces controversy regarding the optimal timing of catheter removal (24 hours vs. 48 hours) and lacks precise preventive measures for patients at high risk of postoperative acute urinary retention (AUR). To address these issues, this study is designed as a three-arm randomized controlled trial, directly comparing three management protocols: catheter removal at 24 hours postoperatively, catheter removal at 48 hours postoperatively, and an individualized strategy guided by a predictive model (i.e., preventive administration of tamsulosin to high-risk AUR patients prior to catheter removal). The primary endpoint is the rate of recatheterization within 7 days after the initial removal, with secondary endpoints comprehensively assessing urinary tract infections, voiding function, and postoperative complications. The ultimate goal is to provide high-quality evidence-based medical evidence to establish a precise and standardized clinical pathway for individualized postoperative catheter management.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early tirofiban administration in patients undergoing IVT

This study plans to enroll 1248 patients with supratentorial ICH within 24 hours of onset across multiple stroke centers. After randomization, the control group will only receive medical therapy. The experimental group, after randomization, will receive an initial dose of 200 mg of minocycline hydrochloride capsules in addition to medical ttherapy, followed by 100 mg orally every 12 hours for 7 days, resulting in a total of 14 administrations. Both groups will be followed for 180 days to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minocycline in the treatment of ICH.