Clinical trials

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if adding a template lymph node dissection (TLND) to the standard surgery for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) can improve patient survival and prevent the cancer from recurrence. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do patients who receive standard surgery with LND live longer without their cancer returning? Is adding LND safe, and how does it affect surgery-related complications? Researchers will compare the group receiving standard surgery plus LND to the group receiving standard surgery alone to see if adding LND is more effective. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical groups. Undergo their assigned surgery and recover in the hospital. Attend regular follow-up visits for checkups and scans for 5 years to monitor for cancer recurrence, with the possibility of long-term follow-up extending to 10 years.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a more thorough lymph node removal surgery, called "Template Lymph Node Dissection," can help prevent cancer from returning and help patients live longer, compared to removing only a few enlarged lymph nodes, in patients with high-risk kidney cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do patients who receive template lymph node dissection live longer without their cancer returning (Disease-Free Survival)? Do patients who receive template lymph node dissection live longer overall (Overall Survival)? Is the more extensive lymph node surgery as safe as the limited surgery? Researchers will compare the Template Lymph Node Dissection group to the Limited Node Resection group to see the effects on cancer control and safety. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical groups. Undergo surgery to remove their kidney and the assigned lymph nodes. Attend regular follow-up visits with imaging scans (like CT or MRI) for the first 5 years after surgery to monitor if the cancer returns. Be followed for their overall survival status for up to 10 years.

This is a prospective cohort study aimed at clarifying the predictive value of MRD for postoperative DFS and OS in high-risk recurrent renal cell carcinoma patients who have undergone radical nephrectomy and received adjuvant treatment with Toripalimab. Further differentiating patients who need adjuvant immunotherapy.

Patients with extensive transurethrally unresectable very-high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) may achieve a tumor-free status after systemic immunotherapy-based bladder-sparing treatment combined with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). However, the optimal duration of systemic immunotherapy after achieving a tumor-free status remains uncertain. Prolonged treatment may increase toxicity, treatment burden, and cost, while some patients may maintain durable disease control without continued therapy. This randomized study aims to evaluate whether active surveillance after achieving tumor-free status is a feasible alternative to continued systemic immunotherapy in patients with extensive transurethrally unresectable very-high-risk NMIBC. Patients will initially receive systemic immunotherapy-based treatment followed by disease evaluation using cystoscopy with biopsy and/or TURBT, urine cytology, urinary tumor DNA (utDNA), and imaging assessments. Patients who achieve tumor-free status after treatment and complete resection of visible disease will be randomized to either active surveillance or continued systemic immunotherapy. The study will evaluate recurrence outcomes, bladder preservation, progression, safety, and patient management strategies following achievement of tumor-free status. The trial also aims to explore the role of urinary tumor DNA in identifying patients who may safely undergo treatment de-escalation and active surveillance.

This study evaluates whether urinary tumor DNA (utDNA) testing, together with clinical, pathologic, and radiographic assessment, can help guide treatment discontinuation and active surveillance in patients with unresectable very-high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (VHR NMIBC) treated with bladder-sparing systemic immunotherapy. Participants receive systemic immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy every 3 weeks for an initial 3 cycles. Initial response assessment is performed using transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and chest and abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT). Participants without progression to muscle-invasive, regional nodal, or distant metastatic disease then undergo post-TURBT urine cytology and urinary tumor DNA (utDNA) testing. Participants with both negative urine cytology and negative utDNA results receive an additional 3 cycles of systemic immunotherapy. After the additional treatment, participants undergo repeat evaluation using cystoscopy with biopsy, urine cytology, utDNA testing, and chest and abdominopelvic CT. Participants with negative findings on cystoscopic biopsy, urine cytology, and utDNA testing, and without radiographic evidence of nodal or distant metastatic disease, discontinue systemic immunotherapy and enter an active surveillance phase with regular follow-up monitoring. Participants who do not meet these criteria continue further clinical management and follow-up according to institutional practice. The study aims to determine whether a shortened duration of systemic immunotherapy guided by integrated molecular, clinical, pathologic, and radiographic response assessment can maintain favorable oncologic outcomes while reducing unnecessary treatment exposure in this high-risk population.

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) accounts for approximately 75% of newly diagnosed bladder cancers and is characterized by a high risk of recurrence and progression. Current guidelines recommend that patients with stage T1 NMIBC undergo a second transurethral resection of bladder tumor (re-TURBT) within 2-6 weeks after the initial surgery to remove residual tumor, confirm staging, and obtain additional pathological information. However, the benefits of routine re-TURBT for all high-risk patients remain controversial, as many patients may not have residual disease, while the procedure carries surgical and anesthetic risks, physical and psychological burden, and additional healthcare costs. Urine tumor DNA (utDNA) refers to DNA fragments shed by tumor cells into urine. It can be detected using molecular assays with high sensitivity and specificity, offering a non-invasive method for bladder cancer diagnosis and surveillance. Previous studies have shown that positive utDNA results after initial TURBT may be associated with residual disease and higher recurrence risk. This multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether utDNA testing can accurately identify NMIBC patients who are most likely to benefit from re-TURBT, thereby guiding the decision to perform the procedure. The goal is to optimize patient selection for re-TURBT, reduce unnecessary surgeries, and improve patient quality of life while maintaining oncologic safety.

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is usually treated with surgery to remove the tumor (transurethral resection of bladder tumor, or TURBT), often followed by bladder-instilled medications to reduce the chance of the cancer coming back. Even with this treatment, high-grade NMIBC can return or progress, so patients need regular check-ups, usually with cystoscopy (a camera examination of the bladder) and urine cytology. Cystoscopy is effective but invasive, can cause discomfort, and carries risks such as infection and bleeding. This makes follow-up costly and sometimes burdensome for patients. This study is testing whether a urine tumor DNA (utDNA) test - a type of "liquid biopsy" that detects cancer-related DNA changes in urine - can help guide the timing of cystoscopy for people with high-risk or very high-risk NMIBC. utDNA testing is non-invasive and has shown high accuracy in detecting bladder cancer, sometimes spotting signs of recurrence earlier than standard methods. By combining utDNA testing with cystoscopy, we hope to safely reduce the number of unnecessary cystoscopies without missing cancer recurrences. The study will evaluate whether this approach can make bladder cancer follow-up more comfortable, more precise, and more efficient.

High-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) carries a substantial risk of residual disease after initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Current guidelines recommend a second TURBT (re-TURBT) within 2-6 weeks for patients with stage T1 disease to remove residual tumor, confirm staging, and obtain additional pathological information. However, the actual survival benefit of routine re-TURBT for all high-risk patients remains debated, and the procedure may pose surgical risks, increase healthcare costs, and impact patient quality of life. Urine tumor DNA (utDNA) and urine tumor RNA (utRNA) are molecular biomarkers detectable through non-invasive "liquid biopsy" methods. In urothelial carcinoma, tumor-derived nucleic acids can be shed into urine, where they can be detected with high sensitivity and specificity. These biomarkers may help identify patients most likely to harbor residual disease after initial TURBT, and thus most likely to benefit from re-TURBT. This prospective, open-label, observational, single-center study aims to evaluate the clinical value of utDNA/utRNA testing in guiding re-TURBT for patients with high-risk NMIBC. The study will assess whether molecular urine testing can improve patient selection for re-TURBT, potentially reducing unnecessary procedures while maintaining oncological safety.

Application of Multi-Component Liquid Biopsy (ctDNA, utDNA, Exosomes, and Protein Biomarkers in Blood and Urine) for Auxiliary Diagnosis, Therapeutic Response Evaluation, and Recurrence Monitoring in Urothelial Carcinoma

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment can be used for specific UTUC patients, especially for highly staged and/or grade tumors, such as kidneys with potentially decreased renal function after RNU. Neoadjuvant therapy is a series of treatments administered preoperatively for UTUC, mainly chemotherapy, and in recent years, novel therapies of immunotherapy have emerged. Since conventional cisplatin neoadjuvant regimens also require high preoperative renal function, neoadjuvant therapy regimens such as immunotherapy provide more effective and feasible treatments for patients who are intolerant to current cisplatin chemotherapy regimens. The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of the combination of disitamab vedotin, a human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) targeted ADC, and tislelizumab, a humanised PD-1 ICIs, as neoadjuvant treatment for non-metastatic, high-risk, HER-2 expressing UTUC. In our study, patients enrolled will receive neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus disitamab-vedotin therapy followed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), distal ureterectomy (DU) or ureteroscopic ablation (UA) .

This study is designed as an open-label, single-arm, single-center, phase II clinical trial, aiming to evaluate the efficacy of nephron-sparing treatment combining Tislelizumab and Nab-Paclitaxel for HER-2 expressing renal pelvic cancer (RPC) . Patients enrolled will receive 2-3 cycles of Tislelizumab in combination with Nab-Paclitaxel every 3 weeks and then undergo evaluation. Patients who achieve all of the following criteria of "well response and tolerance" will receive further maintenance treatment: (1)The patient achieves a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, indicating that the tumor is well-controlled. (2) If the patient has residual lesions, it should be confirmed by the clinical physician that these lesions can be eliminated through laser ablation via ureteroscopy. (3)The patient has not experienced any treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) that warrant discontinuation of therapy during systemic treatment. (4)The patient is willing to undergo further maintenance therapy. If the patient meets all the criteria above, ureteroscopic biopsy should be performed. If residual lesions are detected under the ureteroscope, endoscopic intervention (e.g., laser ablation, cryoablation) should be carried out simultaneously to eliminate these residual lesions. Patients who meet the above criteria will proceed with no less than 2 cycles of maintenance systemic therapy (Tislelizumab + Nab-Paclitaxel). Patients who do not meet the criteria will be excluded from the study and are recommended to undergo salvage radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) as soon as possible. One-year Nephron-Sparing Survival (1 year-NSS): Defined as the absence of surgical indications for nephrectomy due to progression or recurrence of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, distant metastasis caused by the primary upper urinary tract tumor, or death from any cause within 1 year from the initiation of treatment. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) will be recorded and evaluated according to CTCAE 5.0.

This study is a prospective, single arm II clinical trial. The main objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (SKB264) and Tagitanlimab (KL-A167) in the treatment of AVPC (aggressive variant prostate cancer) and NEPC (neuroendocrine prostate cancer).

This is a phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of Super-selective tumor artery embolization combined with toripalimab and axitinib as treatment for patients with the advanced kidney cancer . Further evaluate whether the treatment plan is beneficial to the patient's operation. Patients will undergo super-selective embolization of the feeding arteries to the renal tumour one week prior to drug therapy, followed by toripalimab administered every three weeks for three to four consecutive cycles combined with axitinib administered for four consecutive cycles in the preoperative and patients need to continue taking the drug for a year after surgery

Objective This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL for the treatment of staghorn calculi, compared with standard PCNL. Methods This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial plans to enroll 420 patients with staghorn calculi, randomly assigned into two groups: the experimental group (antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted PCNL, n=210) and the control group (standard PCNL, n=210). The primary endpoint is stone-free rate (defined as no residual fragment ≥2 mm on postoperative CT). Secondary endpoints include operative time, number of percutaneous tracts, rate of secondary procedures, hemoglobin decrease, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), and length of hospital stay. All patients will undergo CT evaluation on postoperative day 2. Subgroup analysis will be performed according to the number of stone branches (≥5 vs \<5).

This study is a single cohort, open label exploratory clinical trial aimed at observing and evaluating the efficacy and safety of Tunlametinib (HL-085) in the treatment of refractory solid tumors with advanced metastatic non melanoma. It is expected that the ORR of Tunlametinib (HL-085) treatment can reach 20%. According to the literature results, the experimental group rate is 0.2 and the target value rate is 0.02. If the bilateral alpha is 0.05 and the beta is 0.2, the sample size is calculated as 12 cases in the experimental group. Considering a 20% dropout rate, a total of 15 cases are required.

This study is designed as an open-label, single-arm, single center, phase II clinical trial, aiming to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant Tislelizumab combined with Nab-Paclitaxel for patients with non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTC). Patients enrolled will receive 2-3 cycles of Tislelizumab in combination with Nab-Paclitaxel every 3 weeks and then undergo radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The assessment of efficacy is based on the histology of specimen from RNU, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) will be recorded and evaluated according to CTCAE 5.0.

This study is designed as an open-label, single-arm, single-center, phase II clinical trial, aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant Tislelizumab combined with Nab-Paclitaxel followed by distal ureterectomy for patients with non-metastatic ureteral cancer (UTC). Patients enrolled will receive 2-3 cycles of Tislelizumab in combination with Nab-Paclitaxel every 3 weeks and then undergo distal ureterectomy (DU). The assessment of efficacy is based on the histology of specimen from DU, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) will be recorded and evaluated according to CTCAE 5.0.

The efficacy and safety of Pazopanib combined with Palbociclib in the third line and above treatment of refractory solid tumors co amplified in the 11q13 region (FGF3/4/19/CCND1).

The main purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of selecting treatment plans based on genomic variations guided by MTB in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vediximab monotherapy or in combination with enrolizumab for second-line treatment of CDK12 alterations mCRPC that has failed standard therapy. The research results are expected to provide new insights and breakthroughs for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

This project plans to establish an organoid chip model of prostate cancer patients with internal organ metastasis from surgical or biopsy tissue sources, and test the sensitivity of commonly used chemotherapy drugs based on organoid chip drug sensitivity testing technology to screen out sensitive individualized treatment plans.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Oncolytic Adenovirus(H101) combined with PD-1 inhibitor in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have previously been resistant to advanced PD-1 inhibitors.