Clinical trials

Oral chemotherapy is a convenient and flexible option for cancer treatment that can improve patients quality of life and increase adherence to treatment compared to traditional intravenous chemotherapy. However, since patients are responsible for taking the medication, there can be issues with continuity and adherence. Like other medications, generics of existing oral chemotherapy have emerged, which help reduce costs and improve access to this therapy. These generics contribute to a more sustainable healthcare system, so it is necessary to implement effective strategies for their adoption. Although generic treatments have been shown to be just as effective as the original drug, there is no regulation requiring the pill to have the same shape and color as the original (what we refer to as appearance). Additionally, the packaging of the treatment is different as it is specific to each brand. Therefore, a patient on a specific treatment may switch from the original medication to a generic or from one generic to another, which may have a different appearance in both the pill and the packaging. It has been observed that these changes can lead to medication errors or a loss of patient confidence, resulting in decreased continuity and adherence to treatment. These issues have been seen with other medications for chronic diseases but have not been studied in cancer patients to date. In these patients, despite the nature of the disease suggesting they would be adherent to treatment, previous studies have shown that this is not the case, with only about 70% of patients being adherent. This lack of adherence affects treatment efficacy, increases the risk of disease relapse, and therefore negatively impacts patient s quality of life and survival while also increasing costs. Therefore, this study focuses on evaluating whether these changes in pill appearance and/or packaging impact treatment continuity and adherence, as well as other relevant patient outcomes and their experience with the healthcare received. Additionally, we want to analyze whether there are patient variables (such as health literacy, age, or clinical variables) that influence the impact of these changes. Given the differences in adherence between men and women, it is essential to conduct these analyses separately for both genders. The results obtained from this study will contribute to the development of educational strategies for managing oral chemotherapy by patients and healthcare professionals. Additionally, new evidence will be generated to allow decision-makers to establish policies, either by choosing treatments with the least change in appearance or by regulating the appearance of treatments. All of this will contribute to greater treatment effectiveness, improved patient quality of life, and a lower rate of disease recurrence.

Strength exercise is an active and dynamic activity that involves applying force against a resistance. This produces fatigue, seen as a reduced ability to apply force during and after the exercise, and perceived effort, which is a person's subjective feeling of how hard they are working. Strength exercise can also be used for therapy, as it has many benefits for different parts of the body. One of these is changing how the individual feels pain. It has been shown that doing strength exercises can reduce pain perception, a phenomenon called exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH), although the exact physical reasons and the amount of exercise needed to cause this effect are not yet known. One of the most studied exercises in this area is the leg extension machine. This is a specific exercise where the legs move freely (open kinetic chain) and the machine guides the movement, which helps keep things stable and limits the effect of other factors. It is usually used to strengthen and grow the muscles in the front of the thigh, especially the quadriceps, but it can also be used to study the effects on EIH. The main goal of this study is to see if fatigue and perceived effort during strength exercise are important for EIH to happen in healthy people. Participants will complete 3 sessions, at least 7 days apart. These will include a control session and 2 sessions designed to show different levels of fatigue. Before, during, and after the sessions, the investigators will measure pain sensitivity, isometric strength, and perceived effort. Also, there will be a test to find the maximum weight for 10 repetitions and several questionnaires to collect basic info (sex, age, height...), weekly physical activity, experience with strength training, and other factors like sleep quality, stress, and mood. All this information will be completely anonymous when the study results are shared.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of a cortical visual prosthesis based on intracortical microelectrodes to provide a limited but useful sense of vision to profoundly blind. This pilot study will provide important information on safety and efficacy for the development of an useful cortical visual neuroprosthesis for the blind.

The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effects of two percutaneous stimulation techniques-Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation (PENS) and Percutaneous Electrolysis (PE)-combined with a therapeutic exercise (TE) program for the shoulder joint complex, on pain and function in individuals with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy. The main question this study seeks to answer is: Would incorporating percutaneous electrical stimulation (PENS) of the axillary and suprascapular nerves and galvanic percutaneous stimulation (PE) of the supraspinatus tendon into a therapeutic exercise (TE) program for the shoulder joint complex improve therapeutic outcomes in terms of pain, function, and upper limb disability? Based on an exercise program in all groups, researchers will compare the efficacy of active PENS and PE, as well as placebo, in all their combinations. Participants will undergo a 12-week exercise program, during which they will receive four sessions (one session per week) of active percutaneous electrical stimulation or a placebo during the first month. Participants will: * Visit the center on four separate occasions for results measurement. * Keep a session log to verify adherence to the exercise program.

The CLEAR-PC project addresses the critical issue of low health literacy in prostate cancer prevention and care, recognising that inadequate health literacy leads to difficulties in understanding complex medical information, limits shared decision making, and increases health inequalities. Given the high prevalence and complexity of prostate cancer, the project aims to design and development of a comprehensive strategy to improve health literacy in the Prostate cancer prevention and care, considering individual capacities, the role of healthcare professionals and organisations, and the influence of social and cultural contexts. In the design and development of this new strategy, the investigators apply both action research and cocreation methodologies because by involving all stakeholders (general population, vulnerable population patients, health professionals, policy makers and other target groups), we ensure that the resulting strategy is user-centred, implementable and responsive to their needs. The design and development of the new strategy will follow a systematic cycle: (a) problem diagnosis by assessing individual contexts, healthcare professionals, organisational aspects and the social framework; (b) adaptation of existing health literacy tools to the specific context of prostate cancer prevention and care, integrating them into a new strategy, followed by evaluation of their usability and acceptability; and (c) observation of results in practice and reflection. Co-creation will be a critical component throughout this process, ensuring that stakeholders are actively involved at every stage, from diagnosis of challenges to refinement and validation of solutions. The consortium, composed of institutions from Spain, Portugal, Croatia, Belgium, the Netherlands and Cyprus, leverages multidisciplinary expertise to create digital and non-innovative tools and educational resources to address public health disparities, reduce misinformation and support decision-making on prostate cancer prevention and care.

Pain neuroscience education is currently one of the techniques being explored in physiotherapy for pain management. The benefits of this technique are gradually becoming evident in various published studies. So far, it has been widely studied for its short-term effects, but the education provided has typically been generic, not focused on exercise. However, it is suggested that this technique should be combined with exercise to achieve the expected outcomes. Therefore, pain education should be tailored to the specific physical activities the subject will perform to maximise its effectiveness. The primary aim of this study is to analyse the outcome of combining exercise with tailored pain neuroscience education on aspects such as pain, kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, exercise conceptualization, and upper limb function in subjects with neck pain. The secondary aim is to evaluate the relationship between kinesiophobia and catastrophizing and their impact on the results of various upper limb performance tests. Finally, the effects of therapeutic exercise alone will be compared with those of therapeutic exercise combined with pain neuroscience education, focusing on pain, kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, and exercise conceptualization. A double-blind, randomised clinical trial has been designed, in which three intervention protocols will be applied to 81 subjects with non-specific neck pain: education with exercise, exercise alone, and placebo alone. Subjects with non-specific neck pain who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled. Demographic characteristics of the subjects, as well as pain, kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, and upper limb performance test scores, will be assessed. This study aims to explore the potential relevance of a pain neuroscience education session prior to therapeutic exercise, as well as to influence the clinical recommendations made by clinicians during treatment.

Despite widespread recognition of social, economic, or environmental health determinants, health action remains heavily dominated by individual-level solutions (e.g., medication, patient counselling, vaccination). This study aims to stimulate changes in health system functioning by demonstrating how the cocreation of actions to address psychological well-being, cardiovascular health, and antimicrobial resistance from within the community can alleviate the burden on primary care services, reduce medicalisation and increase health equity. The scientific approach uses mixed methods and incorporates theory from multiple disciplines. This study will appraise how the current system addresses psychological well-being, cardiovascular (CV) health, and rational use of antibiotics using a population survey, a survey of patients collecting their medication at community pharmacies, aggregate health service indicators on medication consumption and primary care consultations, and qualitative methods exploring stakeholders' perceptions.The investigators will undertake community-based participatory research to engage citizen scientists in the cocreation of community-led actions to promote psychological well-being, CV health, and prevent antimicrobial resistance. The design, implementation, and evaluation of the actions will apply an assets-based approach and apply theories and frameworks from implementation science in an iterative manner over 3 years. Finally, the impact of the cocreated actions will be analysed, considering effectiveness and broader contextual issues such as initiative adoption, implementation, and maintenance. The investigators will use a before-after comparison of survey indicators, an interrupted time-series analysis of health service data and qualitative analysis. The goal is to demonstrate how the integration of community action with attention to the social determinants of health, can lead to a more rational approach to health care and ultimately improve health and health equity.

In post-stroke rehabilitation of the affected upper limb, increasing treatment intensity has been shown to lead to better outcomes compared to conventional approaches with fewer hours of therapy per day and week. However, logistical, human, and material constraints in neurorehabilitation centres often limit the feasibility of increasing treatment intensity. The GRASP programme (Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program) is a home-based exercise intervention grounded in motor learning principles and conducted weekly under the supervision of an occupational therapist. This strategy enables the intensity of upper limb rehabilitation to be increased by up to seven additional hours per week. This project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Spanish version of the HomeGRASP programme, implemented as an adjunct to conventional occupational therapy, in improving quality of life, autonomy, and upper limb functionality in people after stroke. To this end, a single-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Participants in the experimental group will receive conventional occupational therapy in addition to the HomeGRASP programme performed at home, while those in the control group will receive only conventional therapy. The treatment period for both groups will last eight weeks. Participants will be assessed at baseline and after the 8-week intervention period by a blinded evaluator. The primary outcomes will include changes in quality of life and upper limb functionality, measured using the CAVIDACE scale and the Wolf Motor Function Test. Secondary outcomes will include upper limb dexterity and personal autonomy, assessed using the Box and Block Test, Purdue Pegboard Test, Motor Activity Log-30, Duruöz Hand Index, and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).

The study aims to examine the effects of a mindfulness-based intervention and a mindfulness-based intervention with virtual reality on occupational balance and on the reduction of psychological distress in university students (i.e. stress, anxiety and depression). The specific objectives will be to examine the effects of the intervention on other variables related to mental health, psychological functioning and occupations, and their maintenance at three months.

The goal of this open label randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention through health education based on the Chronic Care Model's implementation to increase therapeutic adherence in patients with secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Null hypothesis (H0): In patients in cardiovascular secondary prevention, an intervention based on the application of the Chronic Care Model does not improve therapeutic adherence to the 3 preventive drugs: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/Angiotensin II receptor blockers, acetylsalicylic acid, and statins. * Alternative hypothesis (H1): In patients in cardiovascular secondary prevention, an intervention based on the application of the Chronic Care Model improves therapeutic adherence to the 3 preventive drugs: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/Angiotensin II receptor blockers, acetylsalicylic acid, and statins. Researchers will compare intervention group (health education, use of mobile phones, personalized dosage system) to the control group (routine follow-up).