Delayed Versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Birth

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age0+
SponsorFaculty of Medicine of Tunis

About this trial

The goal of this study is to evaluate whether delayed cord clamping improves early neonatal outcomes compared with immediate clamping in preterm birth.

Preterm infants are at higher risk of neonatal complications, and the timing of cord clamping may influence placental transfusion and neonatal adaptation after birth. Delayed cord clamping may increase blood volume, improve iron stores, and reduce some neonatal morbidities, while immediate cord clamping is still commonly practiced in many settings.

In this study, preterm newborns are assigned to either delayed or immediate cord clamping according to a predefined protocol. Early neonatal outcomes, including respiratory status, need for resuscitation, hemoglobin levels, and early morbidity and mortality, will be assessed.

The study is conducted in a tertiary maternity center in Tunisia.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Preterm neonates born at gestational age between 32 and 37 weeks

Live-born infants delivered in the study center

Singleton pregnancies

Parental consent obtained when applicable according to institutional ethical requirements

Disqualifiers

Major congenital malformations or chromosomal abnormalities

Need for immediate advanced resuscitation at birth

Severe fetal distress requiring emergency obstetric intervention incompatible with protocol allocation

Placental conditions contraindicating delayed cord clamping (e.g., placental abruption with maternal instability, placenta previa bleeding, Placenta accreta spectrum)

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping
  • Immediate Umbilical Cord Clamping

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators