ECMO

ECMO is widely used in patients with refractory respiratory and/or circulatory failure.The data shows that the incidence of bleeding and thrombotic events is still above 40%,and it is closely related to the increase in mortality rate.Therefore, optimizing ECMO anticoagulation management to reduce bleeding and thrombotic events is a key scientific issue that urgently needs to be addressed.

Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is a rescue therapy for a selected group of patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is initiated to bypass the cardiac system and bridge time to definitive treatment of the cardiac arrest (CA) origin. eCPR treatment is very time-critical and, if indicated, should be initiated as early as possible. Patient selection for this highly specific treatment is challenging and relies on numerous factors. In the following phase of intensive care treatment, neuroprognostication is performed. However, following current guidelines, this is only recommended 72hours after CA. Once ECMO is initiated, a complex intensive care treatment is expected, without a guarantee for full neurological recovery. There is a recognized clinical need for more precise selection criteria, alongside predictive values, to enable earlier, reliable neuroprognostication. Aim This study aims to investigate whether super-early neuroprognostication before ECMO initiation is feasible. Super-early neuroprognostication will be performed using automated pupillometry and cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (cNIRS) before ECMO initiation. Methods Patients evaluated for eCPR treatment at the Department of Emergency Medicine will be included in this study. By a study member not involved in clinical treatment, cNIRS and automated pupillometry will be performed before ECMO initiation and at predefined intervals: 10-20 minutes after ECMO Initiation, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 2 hours (±15 minutes), and 3 hours (±15 minutes). Follow-up measurements will be taken 24 hours (± 6 hours), 48 hours (± 6 hours), and 72 hours ± 6 hours after ECMO initiation. The secondary objective is to interpret the collected data regarding outcome parameters.

The goal of this multicenter, randomized trial is to compare standby cannulated ECMO versus prophylactic ECMO in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The main question it aims to answer is : • If standby cannulated ECMO as compared with prophylactic ECMO will improve the outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk PCI

The goal of this randomized interventional clinical trial is to learn if a standardized lung volume optimization maneuver (LVOM) is beneficial in 1. study) children undergoing biventricular repair of their congenital heart disease (CHD) with cardiopulmonary bypass and 2. study) in children with severe respiratory failure at risk for or need for ECMO. The main questions it aims to answer are: Main hypotheses of CHD study: Does a standardized PEEP-Titration maneuver, to optimize end-expiratory lung volume improve: * cardiac performance * lung function Does it make a difference in: * length of ventilation * ventilation/perfusion mismatch of the lung * need for vasopressor support? Main hypotheses of ECMO study: Does a LVOM in children/infants with severe respiratory failure /ARDS * improve lung compliance and gas exchange * facilitate lung protective ventilation according to PALICC-2 guidelines * improve lung aeration and V/Q-matching assessed with EIT Does it make a difference in * need for ECMO * duration of ECMO runs * hemodynamics stability

The goal of this multicenter, randomized trial is to compare early early left ventricular unloading by Intra-aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) versus conventional approach in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). The main question it aims to answer is : • If left ventricular unloading by IABP as compared with the conventional approach will improve the outcomes in patients undergoing VA-ECMO.

ECMO (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) is a life-saving device, used in intensive care to treat severe respiratory or cardiac failure. However, it carries a high risk of serious life-threatening bleeding. Bleeding complications have been attributed to coagulopathy triggered either by the underlying pathology or by the extracorporeal circuit itself, as well as excessive or inappropriate anticoagulation initiated to prevent thrombotic complications. The objective of this cohort is to confirm the interest of the evolution of D-dimers as a prognostic marker of serious bleeding events in patients on veno-venous (VV) or veno-arterial (VA) ECMO, and to determine the threshold.

Rationale: In patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is very common. This is possibly due to the application of liberal thresholds and the lack of evidence-based guidelines. Although RBC transfusion can be lifesaving, it is also a risk-bearing intervention with substantial risk for morbidity and mortality in this critically ill population. Also, with increasing scarcity, RBC transfusions are becoming more expensive. Furthermore, in the past decades it has been shown in several critically ill patient populations - not on ECMO - that maintaining a restrictive hemoglobin (Hb) threshold for RBC transfusion is non-inferior, including in cardiothoracic surgery, acute myocardial infarction and septic shock. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that a restrictive transfusion threshold for RBC is safe to apply in patients on ECMO in comparison with a liberal transfusion threshold. Objective: The primary objective of this trial is to study in a prospective randomized comparison whether a restrictive RBC transfusions strategy is non-inferior compared to a liberal strategy in patients on ECMO with respect to 90-day mortality. Study design: Prospective multi-center randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Study population: Patients, 18 years or older, receiving ECMO. Intervention: Restrictive RBC transfusion threshold: in case the Hb transfusion trigger of 7.0 g/dL (4.3 mmol/L) is reached, 1 RBC unit at a time will be transfused. The aimed Hb target range of the restrictive/intervention group will be 7.1 - 9.0 g/dL (4.3 - 5.6 mmol/L). Liberal RBC transfusion threshold: in case the Hb transfusion trigger of 9.0 g/dL (5.6 mmol/L) is reached, 1 RBC unit at a time will be transfused. Target range of the liberal group is defined as Hb 9.1 - 11.0 g/dL Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome parameter is 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include: 1) proportion of patients on ECMO exposed to allogeneic RBC transfusion; 2) RBC volume infused per patient during ECMO; 3) reasons for RBC transfusion other than Hb triggers; 4) transfusion reactions; 5) time on ECMO; 6) length of hospital- and ICU-stay; 7) in-ICU morbidity; 8) quality of life (QoL), iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) and Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; 9) costs related to a) transfusion, b) hospital admission and c) transfusion-related sequelae.

Prospective open label observational study including patients requiring a tMCS (VA-ECMO or Impella® CP) or in in cardiogenic shock according to the SCAI (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions) ESC (European Society of Cardiology) definition 41,42 and not requiring or not eligible to tMCS (ECMO, Impella®, intra-aortic balloon pump) (control group).

The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam(CAZ-AVI) in the treatment of critically ill patients with carbapenem-resistant organisms(CRO) infections (including dialysis patients and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO) patients).