Cardiogenic Shock

This multicenter randomized controlled trial compare two transfusion strategies of red blood cells transfusion in patients supported by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock. An individualized transfusion strategy based on ScVO2 level, is compared to a conventionnal strategy based on predefined hemoglobin threshold. The primary endpoint is the consumption of packed red blod cells, secondary endpoints are subgroup analysis, mortality, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness

Abiomed IMPELLA-RT-DAQ - Impella Real Time Data AcQuisition

Cardiac disease complicated by respiratory insufficiency comprises the most frequent indication for cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) admission, with nearly one-third patients requiring advanced respiratory support and over 20% patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). IMV among patients with impaired cardiovascular reserve is further compounded by the adverse impact of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and systemic sedation on intracardiac hemodynamics, pulmonary vascular mechanics and consequently end-organ perfusion. Despite widespread use, evidence guiding optimal ventilatory practices and mode selection in cardiovascular intensive care unit patients remains limited. Pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation may differ in their effects on patient-ventilator synchrony, sedation requirements, and hemodynamic impact, but comparative data among patients with critical cardiac disease remains inconclusive. This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of implementing a pragmatic cluster-randomized crossover trial comparing ventilatory modes in a contemporary cardiovascular intensive care unit.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and management approaches of cardiogenic shock throughout the years in adult patients admitted to a Cardiology Department. The main questions it aims to answer are: * How have management strategies and clinical outcomes for cardiogenic shock evolved over time? * How do clinical, laboratory, and advanced hemodynamic monitoring parameters relate to patient survival and overall prognosis in this population? Researchers will evaluate clinical data collected from 2017 onwards to see if therapeutic advancements and changes in clinical management over the years have led to improved patient survival and quality of care. Participants will: * Receive standard, routine medical care for cardiogenic shock as determined by their clinical team (no experimental interventions will be introduced). * Have their clinical, laboratory, and imaging data collected from hospital electronic records during their stay. * Be followed for up to 1 year after hospital admission to evaluate long-term survival and clinical outcomes.

This regulation defines the purpose, the operational processes, and the organization of the registry BEAT-SHOCK (Basel Evaluation of Acute Therapy in cardiogenic SHOCK). It describes the requirements for collecting, storing, processing, managing and sharing health-related registry data.

The main goal of this observational, study is to develop a clinical decision support tool utilizing Impella 5.5 pump parameters to predict native heart recovery and prevent adverse events, by leveraging data science and real-world clinical data of cardiogenic shock patients. Therefore, secondary objectives are essential to consolidating a retrospective longitudinal analysis of Impella 5.5 pump data alongside ICU digital health record datasets to: 1. Validate the Impella 5.5 placement signal by comparing it with ICU arterial line waveforms. 2. Integrate pump data with ICU clinical data to identify patterns associated with therapy outcomes, including native heart recovery, heart replacement therapy, and mortality while on device support. 3. Define clinical scenarios linked to hemolysis, HRAEs, and arrhythmias and develop predictive models to mitigate their occurrence.

The objective of this study is to test the feasibility and efficacy of a novel, non-invasive electronic device to monitor the adequacy of tissue perfusion in patients with advanced heart failure or cardiogenic shock in the ICU. This single-site pilot study will evaluate the FDA-approved Oxygen Delivery Index (ODIN), a non-invasive method for assessing microvascular function and oxygen extraction, in patients with advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock. ODIN comprises ODI Technology (including CAM, DRS, a medical PC, and an enclosure), a standardized data acquisition procedure, and proprietary analysis software. Thirty consecutive patients will be enrolled upon hospital presentation, undergoing ODIN measurement alongside standard clinical assessments. ODI Tech data are collected solely for research correlation with established diagnostic standards; measurements will not be used to diagnose or contribute to any clinical decision making, and will not be used for any clinical indication or guidance.

The study will provide data on profile, management, outcome, and evolution over time of cardiogenic shock patients admitted to the Intensive Coronary Care Units

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the drug istaroxime works to treat mild to moderate cardiogenic shock due to acute heart failure in adults. It will also learn about the safety of istaroxime. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does istaroxime relieve participants' shortness of breath compared to a placebo? * Does istaroxime provide clinical benefit in terms of lowering the risk of dying, having invasive procedures, having worsening heart failure, and/or increasing quality of life compared to a placebo? * Does istaroxime increase blood pressure compared to a placebo? Researchers will compare istaroxime to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if istaroxime works to treat mild to moderate cardiogenic shock due to acute heart failure. Participants will: * Receive a 48-hour intravenous infusion of istaroxime or placebo * Complete questionnaires rating their breathing and describing their quality of life * Return for a visit 30 and 90 days after the initial drug infusion was started

This study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial conducted in China to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel left ventricular assist device, SynFlow Duro system, manufactured by ForQaly Medical in the treatment of post cardiotomy cardiogenic shock.

Sedation (painkillers and sedative drugs) treats pain, reduces suffering, and helps patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain comfortable. ECMO is a life support machine that provides oxygen and removes waste gases (carbon dioxide) in very sick patients with severe heart or lung failure. About 300-400 patients per year receive ECMO in the UK. These patients are younger and generally more healthy compared to other critically ill patients. However patients that survive ECMO have long-term health problems. These include anxiety, memory problems, withdrawal from medicines, and mobility issues. These problems issues could all be related to the type and amount of sedation given. A sedation protocol is a way of guiding healthcare professionals how much sedation is given to patients in ICU. Too much sedation can cause confusion, hallucinations, excessive sleepiness, and longer time in hospital. Too little sedation can cause pain, distress, and also a longer time in hospital. Using a sedation protocol in non-ECMO patients has been shown to reduce these complications. However, there are no protocols for giving sedation to ECMO patients in research papers. Investigators know healthcare staff find it difficult to manage sedation, and higher amounts of sedation is given to ECMO patients. Aims: To see whether it is possible to run a trial that compares using a sedation protocol against usual care. Design/methods: Thirty to 60 ECMO patients will be chosen and will be put into one of two groups. One group will receive usual care, and the other will receive care using the sedation protocol. The investigators will collect information from both groups to find out if the study design works and how many patients agree to take part. Patient and public involvement/engagement: The investigators received feedback from patients and family member participants which helped to design this proposal, the lay summary and what to measure in a trial. They will advise how the investigators should review study findings, and support sharing of results to the public. Impact/dissemination: The investigators will share findings through social media, patient charities, research papers and conferences.

Sedation (painkillers and sedative drugs) treats pain, reduces suffering, and helps patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain comfortable. ECMO is a life support machine that provides oxygen and removes waste gases (carbon dioxide) in very sick patients with severe heart or lung failure. About 300-400 patients per year receive ECMO in the UK. These patients are younger and generally more healthy compared to other critically ill patients. However patients that survive ECMO have long-term health problems. These include anxiety, memory problems, withdrawal from medicines, and mobility issues. These problems issues could all be related to the type and amount of sedation given. A sedation protocol is a way of guiding healthcare professionals how much sedation is given to patients in ICU. Too much sedation can cause confusion, hallucinations, excessive sleepiness, and longer time in hospital. Too little sedation can cause pain, distress, and also a longer time in hospital. Using a sedation protocol in non-ECMO patients has been shown to reduce these complications. However, there are no protocols for giving sedation to ECMO patients in research papers. The investigators know healthcare staff find it difficult to manage sedation, and higher amounts of sedation is given to ECMO patients. Aims: * To describe current sedation use in ECMO patients in the UK and compare to non-ECMO critically ill patients. * To develop a sedation protocol for ECMO patients with input from patients, their family, and staff. Design/methods: Study 1: The investigators will study how sedation is used in adult ECMO patients and compare with non-ECMO but critically ill patients in the UK. The investigators will collect information on drug doses and pain and sedation scores. The investigators will also ask ECMO centres if they use a sedation protocol to adjust sedation doses. This information will be helpful for the design of the protocol in study 2. Study 2: The investigators will design a sedation protocol with input from patients, family, and staff. The investigators will organise meetings to share experiences and agree on what to include in the protocol that is considered acceptable and safe. The investigators will then assess if the protocol is safe and acceptable with staff outside the co-design group. Patient and public involvement/engagement: The investigators received feedback from patients and family members which helped to design this proposal, the lay summary and what to measure in a trial. Patients and family members will continue to help with development of the sedation and trial protocol. They will advise how the investigators should review study findings, and support sharing of results to the public. Impact/dissemination: The investigators will share findings through social media, patient charities, research papers and conferences.

Mitral regurgitation may be seen in the setting of cardiogenic shock. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure. Observational studies suggest improvements in clinical outcomes in patients with mitral regurgitation in the setting of cardiogenic shock; however, there remains a lack of randomized clinical data to support the use of TEER in cardiogenic shock. This study will be a multicenter, open-label, randomized-controlled trial with two study arms: medical therapy and TEER. Patients admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU), Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit (CSICU) or Intensive Care Units (ICU) at participating centers will be recruited. The study aims to answer the question: "Does TEER in patients with SCAI stage C or D cardiogenic with concomitant moderate or greater mitral regurgitation improve outcomes as compared to medical therapy?" The study hypothesis is that TEER will lead to an overall improvement in the composite outcome as compared to the medical therapy arm.

The goal of this multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial is to learn whether norepinephrine or dopamine is more effective and safer as the first-line vasoactive drug for treating cardiogenic shock in adults. Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition in which the heart cannot pump enough blood to supply the body. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Does norepinephrine reduce the risk of death or worsening cardiogenic shock compared with dopamine? Does norepinephrine lead to fewer complications such as arrhythmias, the need for mechanical circulatory support, or cardiac arrest? Researchers will compare norepinephrine and dopamine to see which drug better stabilizes blood pressure, improves tissue perfusion, and prevents progression of shock during the early phase of treatment. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to receive either norepinephrine or dopamine as the first vasoactive drug Receive treatment and monitoring based on current clinical guidelines for cardiogenic shock Undergo regular assessments of blood pressure, laboratory values, heart rhythm, and organ function during hospitalization Be followed for outcomes at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after enrollment This study aims to provide evidence that will help determine which initial vasoactive drug offers better outcomes for patients with cardiogenic shock and guide future treatment recommendations.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) with and without left ventricular (LV) unloading in patients being treated for cardiogenic shock (CS). The main aims of the study are: 1. To determine the physiologic effects on cardiopulmonary congestion of adding LV unloading to VA ECMO 2. To determine the effects on myocardial function of adding LV unloading to ECMO 3. To test the effects on myocardial recovery of adding LV unloading to VA ECMO Participants who are being treated with VA ECMO will be randomized to receive or not receive LV unloading in the form of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Over the course of the study, the investigators will obtain measurements via lab work, echocardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter that will allow comparison of the two groups.

The study will evaluate the impact of a combined device-drug strategy with Impella 5.5 with best practices and optimized GDMT on heart recovery outcomes in patients with decompensated heart failure and cardiogenic shock.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if acute transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is superior to standard treatment (stabilization in an intensive care unit and TAVI subsequently) to treat cardiogenic shock in patients with critical severe aortic stenosis. The main questions it aims to answer are: • Does acute TAVI increase survival compared with standard treatment? Participants will: * Undergo either TAVI within 12 hours after admission or stabilization and TAVI 72 hours or more after admission * Visit an outpatient clinic and be evaluated for quality of life and heart function

This study will evaluate the feasibility and safety of achieving therapeutic concentrations of beta-hydroxybutyrate using continuous infusion of D-beta-hydroxybutyrate monoester administered via a nasogastric tube in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.

Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition characterized by inadequate cardiac output, leading to organ hypoperfusion and high mortality. Maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) is crucial, but standard targets may be insufficient due to venous congestion. Central venous pressure (CVP) can help assess effective perfusion pressure. This study investigates whether a personalized MAP target adjusted by CVP improves organ function and survival compared to standard MAP management.

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether information collected during routine hospital care, together with blood and urine samples, can help doctors better identify different types of cardiogenic shock and better predict outcomes in adults hospitalized with acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock. The main question is whether clinical findings, imaging results, and biomarkers, including sex-specific factors, are associated with the risk of death within 30 days. Participants will not receive an experimental treatment. Researchers will collect data from routine care, collect additional blood and urine samples for biobanking, and follow participants after hospital discharge

An observational cohort study to evaluate the benefit of functional parameters, radiomics and blood biomarkers to predict the outcome of patients with acute heart failure.

Rationale: Pump failure due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can lead to cardiogenic shock (CS): a state of low blood flow to end-organs with subsequent multi-organ failure that is associated with high mortality rated. The first line pharmacologic treatment strategy in CS is noradrenaline. This vasopressor drug is used to maintain adequate blood pressures. The assumption is that a mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mmHg will improve flow and thereby tissue perfusion of myocardium and other tissues (e.g. renal). However, there is no evidence that an increase in MAP, if achieved by noradrenaline, leads to greater end-organ blood flow and better outcomes. Objective: With this study the investigators aim to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of reduced noradrenaline in patients with CS by using a lower MAP target of ≥ 55 mmHg, compared to ≥ 65 mmHg. The investigators hypothesize that reduced use of noradrenaline will improve overall survival and decrease renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy. Study design: Open label, randomized controlled multicenter trial Study population: Adults patients with CS due to AMI Intervention: Treatment strategy of reduced noradrenaline, by using a lower MAP target ( ≥ 55 mmHg). Main study endpoint: composite of all-cause mortality and severe renal failure leading to renal replacement therapy within 30-days after randomization.

This study aims to better understand how mechanical ventilation settings affect patients admitted to the coronary care unit after cardiac arrest or with cardiogenic shock. These patients often require mechanical ventilation, but current guidelines provide limited evidence on the best approach. Improper ventilation settings can lead to acid-base imbalances, such as respiratory acidosis or alkalosis, which may worsen patient outcomes. The retrospective analysis will include 100 adult patients (50 post-cardiac arrest and 50 with cardiogenic shock) who were mechanically ventilated upon admission. The study has two main objectives: Determine how often acid-base disorders occur in these patients and describe their characteristics. Compare the initial ventilator settings chosen by clinicians with those suggested by VentilO, a decision-support algorithm. The investigators will evaluate the potential effect of the VentilO recommendations on the first arterial (or capillary) blood gases compared to the real settings. This information will help refine the algorithm and guide future research on improving ventilation strategies for critically ill cardiac patients. Participation does not involve any intervention, as the study uses existing medical records.

A prospective, multi-center, open label, randomized controlled, superiority trial to compare clinical outcomes between routine distal perfusion catheter (DPC) insertion versus provisional distal perfusion catheter (DPC) insertion in the occurrence of sign or symptom of acute limb ischemia in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS) through femoral artery approach.

This large real-world international prospective registry will provide a unique opportunity to comprehensively understand the contemporary management, clinical course and short as well as long-term outcomes of all Cardiogenic Shock (CS) patients cared for at four high volume dedicated shock care centers. As the first true North American multicenter CS collaborative with a uniform dedicated and comprehensive case report form, the high patient volumes and wide spectrum of clinical acuity seen at these institutions will provide valuable insight into the factors associated with adverse outcomes; and will serve as a blueprint for future clinical trial designs that may better inform clinical practice.