Sciatica

Piriformis Syndrome is a neuromuscular condition with symptoms of pain, numbness and tingling tracing the route of the sciatic nerve, due to the nerve impingement by the piriformis muscle. Two common manual therapy techniques used to treat musculoskeletal conditions are myofascial release and post-isometric relaxation. The intent of the research is to evaluate the effects of myofascial release (MFR) as compared to post-isometric relaxation (PIR) in improving pain and lower extremity function in piriformis syndrome (LEFS). The study population involved 32 individuals aged between 20 to 50 years who will be randomly assigned to two groups; a group that received MFR and a group that received PIR. Both groups received the baseline treatment for four weeks. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be employed to gauge the amount of pain, while the LEFS was used to measure functional mobility

objective of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of both tensioner and slider neurodynamic approaches in patients suffering from sciatica. This study seeks to establish which approach is more efficacious in alleviating pain intensity, disability functional, and mobility. The results of this study will assist physical therapists in making an informed decision on the type of neurodynamic therapy for their patients.

Chronic low back pain is a common and disabling condition that affects millions of people in the United States. Many people with chronic low back pain do not get enough relief from current treatments. Cannabis may help reduce pain, but researchers do not fully understand how it affects the brain in people with chronic pain. The purpose of this study is to examine how inhaled cannabis changes brain activity and reduces pain in people with chronic low back pain. Results from this study may help researchers better understand how cannabis works for pain and support the development of improved pain treatments.

The FINDISC trial studies whether common back operation, microdiscectomy, is effective and safe for treating sciatica caused by a lumbar disc herniation. The study includes people whose leg pain has not improved after at least six weeks of non-surgical treatment. The FINDISC trial aims to recruit and randomly allocate 122 participants to receive either the actual operation (discectomy) or a placebo (sham) surgery. The placebo (sham) procedure involves anesthesia and an approach similar to the real operation, but no removal of disc material or bone. Participants and healthcare staff, excluding the surgical team, will not know which treatment was given. The study compares pain relief, recovery, daily functioning, quality of life, and harms between the two groups. The goal of the study is to provide reliable evidence to help patients and clinicians decide whether microdiscectomy offers meaningful benefits compared with placebo surgery.

This clinical study focuses on people who experience long-term low-back related leg pain (commonly called sciatica). This type of pain is often associated with nerve irritation or compression in the lower spine and can cause symptoms like shooting or burning pain, tingling, numbness, or weakness in the leg. Many patients continue to suffer from this problem for months or years, and available treatments (including painkillers, anti-inflammatory drugs, or even surgery) do not always provide lasting relief. Because of this, there is a strong need to explore safe, non-drug, non-surgical therapies. The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy and safety of a treatment called Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS) when applied near the sciatic nerve, the large nerve that runs from the lower back through the buttock and down the leg, in combination with a therapeutic exercise program. PENS uses very thin sterile needles inserted under ultrasound guidance next to the nerve. A gentle electrical current is then applied for about 30 minutes to stimulate the nerve in a controlled way. This may help calm down nerve sensitivity, reduce inflammation, and decrease pain. We will compare PENS with three other options: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): A commonly used therapy where mild electrical stimulation is applied through adhesive patches placed on the skin; Dry needling without electrical current: Thin needles are inserted under ultrasound guidance but no current is applied; and placebo treatment: A simulated version of the therapy with no active current, designed to look and feel similar so that participants do not know which treatment they are receiving. In addition to these treatments, all participants will take part in a structured exercise program aimed at strengthening the lower back, pelvis, and legs. Exercises like curl-ups, planks, bridges, bird-dogs, and squats will be supervised weekly for six weeks, with guidance to continue practicing at home. Exercise is included because it is known to help improve mobility, strength, and recovery in people with back problems. The study is designed as a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, which means that participants are assigned to one of the four groups by chance (like flipping a coin), and neither the patients nor the therapists who collect the measurements will know which treatment has been given. This design ensures fairness and reliability of the results. We will measure: Back and leg pain levels, using a simple 0-10 scale; Disability, meaning how much the pain limits daily activities, measured with a well-known questionnaire; Quality of life, both physical and mental health aspects; Nerve-related pain features, like burning or electric-like sensations; and patients' global impression of improvement and any side effects. Assessments will take place before starting the treatment, at the end of the 6-week program, and then again at 3 and 6 months. This allows us to see both the short-, mid- and long-term effects. Safety considerations: Previous research shows that PENS and similar techniques are generally very safe. The most common side effects are mild and short-lasting, including temporary soreness, heaviness in the leg, or a small bruise. Serious complications are extremely rare. To minimize risks, all procedures will be carried out by experienced physiotherapists, using real-time ultrasound to guide needle placement and ensure accuracy. Only sterile, single-use needles are employed. By comparing PENS, TENS, dry needling, and placebo, this study seeks to determine whether PENS in combination with therapeutic exercise provides superior benefits in reducing pain, improving function, and enhancing quality of life for patients with sciatica-type low back pain. If successful, this treatment could become a valuable alternative to drugs or surgery, offering patients a safe and effective therapy to better manage their condition and regain daily function.

This clinical study focuses on people who experience long-term low-back related leg pain (commonly called sciatica). This type of pain is often associated with nerve irritation or compression in the lower spine and can cause symptoms like shooting or burning pain, tingling, numbness, or weakness in the leg. Many patients continue to suffer from this problem for months or years, and available treatments (including painkillers, anti-inflammatory drugs, or even surgery) do not always provide lasting relief. Because of this, there is a strong need to explore safe, non-drug, non-surgical therapies. The purpose of this study is to test the immediate and short-term efficacy and safety of a single session of a treatment called Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS) when applied near the sciatic nerve, the large nerve that runs from the lower back through the buttock and down the leg. PENS uses very thin sterile needles inserted under ultrasound guidance next to the nerve. A gentle electrical current is then applied for about 30 minutes to stimulate the nerve in a controlled way. This may help calm down nerve sensitivity, reduce inflammation, and decrease pain. The investigators will compare PENS with three other options: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): A commonly used therapy where mild electrical stimulation is applied through adhesive patches placed on the skin; Dry needling without electrical current: Thin needles are inserted under ultrasound guidance but no current is applied; and placebo treatment: A simulated version of the therapy with no active current, designed to look and feel similar so that participants do not know which treatment they are receiving. The study is designed as a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, which means that participants are assigned to one of the four groups by chance (like flipping a coin), and neither the patients nor the therapists who collect the measurements will know which treatment has been given. This design ensures fairness and reliability of the results. The investigators will measure: Back and leg pain levels, using a simple 0-10 scale; Disability, meaning how much the pain limits daily activities, measured with a well-known questionnaire; Quality of life, both physical and mental health aspects; Nerve-related pain features, like burning or electric-like sensations; Flexibility and movement, through the Straight Leg Raise test; Sensitivity to pressure and nerve stiffness, using ultrasound elastography, which is a safe imaging technique; and patients' global impression of improvement and any side effects. Assessments will take place before and immediately after the treatment session and after 1 week, allowing the investigators to see both the immediate and short-term effects. Safety considerations: Previous research shows that PENS and similar techniques are generally very safe. The most common side effects are mild and short-lasting, including temporary soreness, heaviness in the leg, or a small bruise. Serious complications are extremely rare. To minimize risks, all procedures will be carried out by experienced physiotherapists, using real-time ultrasound to guide needle placement and ensure accuracy. Only sterile, single-use needles are employed. By comparing PENS, TENS, dry needling, and placebo, this study seeks to determine whether a single session of PENS provides superior benefits in reducing pain, improving function, and enhancing quality of life for patients with sciatica-type low back pain. If successful, this treatment could become a valuable alternative to drugs or surgery, offering patients a safe and effective therapy to better manage their condition and regain daily function.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if electroacupuncture can improve sleep in people with chronic sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation. It will also assess the safety of this treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are whether electroacupuncture improves sleep quality and whether it reduces pain and improves daily function. Researchers will compare electroacupuncture to a sham treatment, which looks like real acupuncture but has little or no therapeutic effect, to determine its effectiveness. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive electroacupuncture or sham treatment, will receive treatment three times per week for four weeks, and will complete questionnaires about their sleep, pain, and daily activities.

Lumbar radiculopathy is a common condition caused by irritation or compression of a lumbar nerve root, often resulting in radiating leg pain, numbness, weakness, and functional limitation. Conservative physiotherapy is commonly used as first-line treatment, but outcomes vary among patients. This randomized controlled trial will compare Mirror Image Spine Correction Exercises with standardized conservative physiotherapy in adults with lumbar radiculopathy. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is lumbar nerve root microstructural integrity measured using Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), including Fractional Anisotropy and other diffusion parameters. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, disability, spinal alignment, and adverse events. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a targeted posture-correction exercise approach provides greater improvement than conventional physiotherapy.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of interlaminar steroid injections at treating pain in lumbar radiculopathy at varying doses, to evaluate the efficacy of interlaminar steroid injections at improving quality of life and function in lumbar radiculopathy at varying doses, and to evaluate difference in efficacy between triamcinolone and dexamethasone interlaminar steroid injections at treating pain in lumbar radiculopathy at varying doses, with the overarching hypotheses that there is no difference in reported pain reduction, quality of life, or function among patients receiving low, moderate, or high doses, and no difference in reported pain reduction between triamcinolone and dexamethasone.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of C-1101 administered as a single dose, transforaminal epidural injection compared to sterile saline

Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) is a commonly used minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain secondary to disc herniation. Although TFESI has been shown to provide significant pain relief in a substantial proportion of patients, the onset, duration, and temporal pattern of pain relief after the procedure vary considerably among individuals. The relationship between early pain response patterns and long-term treatment success remains poorly understood. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate whether temporal changes in pain intensity following TFESI, particularly during the early post-procedural period, are associated with clinical treatment success at mid- and long-term follow-up. Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at predefined time points following the procedure, and treatment success will be defined as a ≥50% reduction in NRS score compared with baseline.

The Move-MORE study is designed to evaluate a multicomponent mindfulness and movement program for patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy. The program brings together mindfulness training to help participants develop awareness of their body and manage pain-related stress, gentle movement practice to improve comfort with physical activity and support function, and motivational interviewing to strengthen motivation, confidence, and the ability to make healthy changes. The main objectives are to determine whether it is feasible for participants to use each component of the program when delivered online, to assess how acceptable and engaging each component is, and to evaluate the impact on pain, physical function, and daily activity levels. The study intervention will be conducted entirely remotely. Participants will complete online surveys, brief daily check-ins on their phone, and wear a small activity monitor on the hip to measure movement. They will also undergo quantitative sensory testing to evaluate pain sensitivity. At the end of the program, participants will share feedback about their experiences via qualitative interviews. The findings will help identify which parts of the program provide the greatest benefit, with the ultimate goal of developing a more targeted and effective digital program for people with this condition.

This prospective observational study aims to develop artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive models to estimate treatment response in patients with sciatica undergoing transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). Approximately 1500 adult patients diagnosed with sciatica and scheduled for TFESI at Marmara University Training and Research Hospital Algology Clinic will be enrolled. Clinical, radiological, laboratory, and psychological data will be systematically collected before the procedure and at multiple follow-up points (1 hour, 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment). Pain relief, measured by a 50% or greater reduction in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), will be the primary outcome. The study will use these comprehensive data sets to train and validate AI algorithms, aiming to create a decision-support system that can predict individual patient responses to TFESI and improve personalized treatment planning.

Sciatica involves a radiating pain along the sciatic nerve, extending from the lower back through the hips and buttocks to each leg. Typically resulting from a herniated disk or spinal stenosis, this condition causes nerve compression that leads to pain, inflammation, and often numbness in the affected leg. Studies have shown that sensorimotor training with myofascial release can be effective in improving pain, lumbar range of motion and functional disability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of Sensorimotor control training with and without myofascial releases on Pain, Lumbar range of motion and functional disability due to sciatica. Participants which meet inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated using online randomization tool into two groups. Group A will receive somatosensory control training with Routine Physical Therapy for 45 minutes with short resting interval for Group B will receive Somatosensory training with myofascial release technique for 45min. Each group will receive treatment sessions of 3 days per week for 12 weeks.

Sciatica is not a medical condition itself, but is a symptom of whatever condition is affecting your sciatic nerve. Pain in the lower back, hip and legs is the most common symptom. However, tingling, numbness and weakness are also symptoms of a damaged sciatic nerve. Physical therapy is a popular and effective way of treating the pain from sciatica. Myofascial release (MFR) is another useful option for sciatica due to the fact that it focuses the connective tissues of the body, including muscles and the fibrous tissues, often called fascia, encircling the joints.This study will be conducted to compare the Effects of myofacial release technique with and without sciatic nerve slider technique on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability among cricket players with Sciatica. This study will be conducted because, no such evidence found in literature to find out the effects of myofacial release technique with sciatic nerve slider technique for sciatica. Myofacial release technique and sciatic nerve slider technique are useful, because these can reduce patients number of visits for the treatment and are easy to use, feasible and cost effective. The sciatic nerve is the largest nerve in the human body. It is formed at the point where five nerves from the lower back all come together, and stretches all the way from the hips to the bottoms of the feet. When this important nerve becomes compressed, inflamed or irritated, it causes the pain in the lower back and legs known as sciatica. A physical therapist uses a number of proven methods to help relieve sciatic pain. One of the most commonly employed methods is known as myofascial release therapy. Myofascial release is a method that a physical therapist can use to treat many sources of pain that are caused by damage to the nervous system. It involves the therapist using hands-on, manual techniques to release areas of tension and pain in the body. Here are three reasons that myofascial release is an effective tool for treating sciatica.

Patients suffering from sciatica are treated conservatively for the first 8 weeks due to the favourable prognosis. This period is preferably extended up to 14-16 weeks after which patients may opt for surgery. However, patients may experience severe discomfort due to pain in the leg which can lead to decreased physical activity and socio-economic problems. An adequate therapy to alleviate symptoms during this period of 'wait-and-see' is lacking. In this study, patients will be randomized to treatment with transforaminal epidural injections or standard oral pain medication.