Clinical trials

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a single dose of XBD173, a medicine that binds to a protein called the 18 kiloDalton Translocator Protein (TSPO), affects how the body processes glucose in healthy volunteers aged 18 to 75 years. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does a single dose of XBD173 change fasting blood glucose levels compared with placebo? * Does a single dose of XBD173 change blood glucose levels after participants drink a glucose solution compared with placebo? Researchers will compare XBD173 with a placebo, which does not contain the active medicine, to see whether activating TSPO affects glucose metabolism in the fasting state and after a glucose drink. Participants will: * Attend a screening visit to confirm eligibility, including a medical history, physical examination and blood tests. * Attend four study visits after fasting overnight: two visits involving a glucose drink and two visits without a glucose drink. * Receive a single oral dose of XBD173 at some visits and placebo at other visits. The order will be randomised, and neither participants nor the study team conducting the assessments will know which treatment is given during each visit. * Have repeated blood samples taken through a cannula to measure glucose, insulin and other markers related to metabolism and inflammation. * Have resting energy use measured by breathing under a transparent canopy connected to a standard metabolic measurement device. * Have blood pressure, heart rate, height and weight measured. * Undergo measurement of blood vessel function using a cuff.

In the UK, babies born at 22 weeks of pregnancy have only been offered survival-focused care (sometimes called resuscitation or stabilisation) since 2019. Very few babies are born this early each year and sadly a lot of them do not survive. Therefore, healthcare teams don't have much information about this new population of tiny babies and there is much to learn about how they respond, the problems they face and the best way for intensive care units to look after them. This study aims to collect information available in babies' medical notes, analyse it and share learning to start improving this knowledge. There will be no changes to the babies' care, only observation of what happens. A small team of doctors and nurse practitioners who have/are looking after a baby, will put a small amount of selected information, without 'identifiers' such as the baby's name, date of birth or hospital number, onto a secure database platform at Imperial College London (a university). Researchers will analyse the information from all the babies around the UK together to look for trends and to describe common things that happen to them, as well as their outcomes. Parents will be made aware this information is being collected and used through a leaflet. It will not be possible to identify an individual baby in the results. The investigators are aiming for around 45 hospitals across the UK to participate. Babies born at 22 weeks gestation, who are attended to at birth by a neonatal team (or admitted) at an intensive care site over a 12-month period will be included. While collecting this information will not impact the babies included, it may help the treatment of babies born early in the future and give families more accurate information about what they might expect to happen.

ORBITA-SOLAR is an invasive physiological cardiac catheterisation study that aims to determine whether different coronary stenoses have different angina thresholds. The angina threshold is defined as the amount of coronary flow reduction required to reproduce symptoms. Sixty patients with symptoms of stable angina and 2 coronary artery stenoses amenable to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) will be recruited. This study will use intra-coronary balloon inflation during supine exercise on an ergometer to measure the fractional flow reserve (FFR) and non-hyperemic pressure ratio (NHPR) that relates to angina onset, in real time, at the location of each stenosis.

Guidelines for patients having first-time implants advocate that even when heart function is only mildly impaired, modern pacing approaches should be utilised to avoid the potentially damaging effects of RV pacing to preventing symptoms from pacing induced or worsened cardiomyopathy. However, once a traditional (RV) pacemaker is implanted, development of impaired heart function does not prompt a device upgrade. Even at the end of battery life, physicians simply replace it like-for-like. This trial tests whether such patients have better symptoms and quality of life if changed to a modern physiological pacing strategy from the traditional RV pacing approach. In this crossover trial, participants will be upgraded to a physiological pacing strategy. After their procedure, they will have a one-month run-in period to recover from the procedure (their pacemaker will be programmed to continued RV pacing). They will be have 2 one-month blinded time periods, randomised to physiological pacing or right ventricular pacing alternately. They will subsequently undergo two six-month blinded randomised time periods. Patients will document symptoms monthly on a mobile phone application or computer. At the end of each time period, they will have measurements of heart function, a walking test and quality-of-life questionnaires including the SF-36 questionnaire. The investigators hypothesise that upgrading to physiological pacing strategies will improve patients' quality of life.

Studies have shown that following bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS), patients continue to experience dissatisfaction with their new body image and identity). The reason for this is poorly understood but negative body image perception after surgery is linked to poor psychological and clinical outcomes. Our pilot study looking at the acceptability and feasibility of 3D reconstruction and virtual reality (VR) in addressing body image in BMS found that participants felt better informed about how their body will change following significant weight loss and agreed this novel intervention would be beneficial in helping patients adjust to changes in their body after BMS. The investigators propose a randomised control trial comparing group body image counselling and group body image counselling with 3D reconstruction and VR in addressing body image in BMS. The study aims to enrol 80 participants from the Tier 4 bariatric group at St Mary's Hospital and Chelsea \& Westminster Hospital. After consent, participants will be divided into two groups: the control group will receive traditional group body image counselling, and the intervention group will receive the same counselling supplemented with VR and 3D reconstructed images depicting 15% and 25% total less body weight. Both groups will undergo four sessions over six months. The investigators will collect data including body measurements and 3D images of the participant in their underwear using a secure password protected device at baseline and follow participants at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months post-BMS. Patient reported outcomes will be assessed through patient-reported questionnaires. This trial seeks to determine if integrating 3D reconstruction and VR technology into body image counselling can provide better support for patients adjusting to body image changes post-BMS, potentially leading to improved psychological and clinical outcomes.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) refers to the ability of microorganisms like bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites to resist the effects of antimicrobial drugs (such as antibiotics) which are widely used as treatment. AMR poses an escalating global health threat, contributing to difficult-to-treat infections associated with increased disease spread, disability and death, as well as a substantial economic burden. In chronic lung diseases, such as bronchiectasis, Cystic fibrosis or chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), there is a higher risk of AMR due to the exposure to frequent or prolonged courses of antibiotics to treat recurrent lung infections and exacerbations (flares of the disease), to reduce lung inflammation or to control chronic infection within the lung with suppression of colonising microbes. Most data on AMR in chronic lung diseases derive from analysing pre-existing routinely collected health data collected on a national basis which is often incomplete. Hence a prospective study is crucial to better understand and address AMR in chronic lung diseases. Prospective studies follow patients forward in time, collecting data on outcomes and allowing researcher to observe the natural history of AMR development, monitor trends and evaluate interventions. This multicentre prospective study, as part of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) Clinical Research Collaboration on Antimicrobial Resistance in Lung Disease (CRC - AMR Lung), aims to investigate the patterns of AMR in chronic lung diseases through a fully anonymous registry alongside a prospective sub-cohort study tracking individuals with chronic lung disease and known colonisation with high-priority AMR pathogens (microorganisms). This study will enable analysis of prevalence and burden of AMR within chronic lung disease alongside understand the genetic drivers of resistance, the link between the microbial genotype and antimicrobial resistance and how transmission of resistance occurs in chronic lung disease.

The goal of this clinical study is to learn if it is possible to reduce the spread of resistant bacteria called CPEs (Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales) between patients admitted to hospital. CPEs can be carried in the gut of people without making them ill. Normally when patients come into hospital, they may undergo a swab test on their bottom to see if CPEs can be grown. This test can take up to 24 hours to produce a result. The investigators want to use a faster test which takes 2 hours to produce a result, and whether this can make a difference to CPE spread between person to person. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Why do people carry, transmit or get infected with CPE? 2. If a faster test was used to look for CPE, would this be better at reducing patient spread in hospital? 3. Is a faster test also more cost effective? Participants will: 1. Be tested by both the usual and faster test when they come into hospital by a swab on their bottom 2. Where they test positive for CPE they will be asked to answer some questions about their health

Endovenous interventions are keyhole operations for varicose veins that are carried out from within the vein itself. Varicose veins are enlarged veins close to the surface of the skin. They are connected to the bigger deeper veins in the leg (known as deep veins). Because of this, operations to close the varicose veins can increase the chance of a blood clot forming in the deep veins. Blood clots in the deep veins happen in around 1 in 50 people after endovenous operations. A clot in the leg can cause swelling, pain, and other long-term problems. If a clot in the leg breaks off and travels to the lungs, it can cause problems with the lung' ability to move oxygen from the air into the blood and may, in rare cases, be life threatening. Varicose vein procedures may carry a slightly higher risk of blood clot formation, and we are currently unsure if current clot reducing medicines are beneficial in preventing blood clots in people having varicose vein procedures. This study will investigate if it is worthwhile prescribing medicines to reduce blood clots after varicose vein procedures.

Large vessel vasculitis (LVV) is an autoimmune inflammatory disorder affecting the major arteries of the body. The diagnosis and monitoring this condition can be challenging, as patients often present with symptoms that are unclear, and the diagnostic criteria currently used are varied. Accurate diagnosis is essential because it helps to tailor the treatment to each patient. Some treatments, such as steroids and immunosuppressive medications, can have significant side effects, so they need to be used carefully and only when truly needed. An \[18F\]FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) involves the injection of a small amount of radiolabelled sugar, which assesses glucose metabolism within the body. \[18F\]FDG PET/CT is already used by the NHS to detect inflammation within the vessel walls and diagnose LVV. Current diagnostic criteria for LVV largely rely on visual assessment by a radiologist. This approach therefore has limitations and may not fully capture changes in the levels of inflammation over time. A new generation of scanners, known as Long Axial Field-of-View (LAFOV)-PET/CT or Total Body PET, are currently transforming what is possible in the field of medical imaging. These LAFOV-PET/CT scanners have new digital detectors that are more sensitive, produce sharper images, and can scan the entire body rapidly. This offers several potential advantages for patients with LVV, including the clearer detection of vessel wall inflammation, the ability to administer lower doses of the radiolabelled sugar (\[18F\]FDG), and the ability to take repeated pictures over time to measure subtle changes in blood flow and inflammation. Patients receiving a routine NHS \[18F\]FDG PET/CT scan for LVV are typically scanned 60 minutes after injection of the radiotracer using a standard PET/CT. Another benefit of LAFOV-PET/CT scanners is their ability to assess the amount of the radiolabelled sugar taken up by the whole body almost as soon as it is injected which could give important additional information. As part of the LAVA-FLOW study we are planning to combine LAFOV-PET/CT with a CT Angiogram (CTA) in patients with LVV. A CTA is a scan that shows doctors what your blood vessels look like. It involves the injection of a dye into a vein that makes your blood vessels visible, highlighting vessel wall inflammation and vessel wall narrowing. This combination of LAFOV-PET/CT and CTA therefore has the potential to give a much more detailed picture of LVV than is achievable using current methods. The LAVA-FLOW study therefore aims to develop a standardised protocol to be used in different hospital centres across the UK for the imaging of LVV using LAFOV-PET/CT. We also hope that the results of this particular study could lead to further larger studies with the potential to update the diagnostic criteria and improve the monitoring of this condition.

Induction of labour (IOL) is a common procedure to initiate childbirth, around one in three pregnant women having their labour induced in the UK. Labour may be induced for many different reasons, including going past the due date, having high blood pressure, diabetes, concerns about the baby's growth, or reduced movements. IOL can be a complex and lengthy process, sometimes lasting up to seven days. Many women find that their expectations of IOL do not match their real experiences. Research shows that between 5% and 20% of women report a negative birth experience, and this can have lasting effects. These may include difficulties bonding with their baby, depression after birth, fear of future childbirth, or choosing a caesarean section next time. Studies also show that women who feel unprepared for induction, or who do not fully understand the benefits, risks, and steps involved, are more likely to have a difficult experience. At the same time, research suggests that some healthcare professionals may not feel fully confident in their knowledge of induction, and their decisions may be influenced by colleagues or local practice rather than evidence alone. This project aims to understand how much women know about induction before it begins, how this knowledge affects their experience, and how well clinicians understand and communicate about induction. To do this, investigators will invite women who are booked for induction at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital or West Middlesex Hospital to take part in two surveys: one before induction and one after birth. Women will also be able to volunteer for an interview to talk in more detail about their experience. They will also invite all maternity staff at the Trust to complete a short survey about their knowledge and attitudes towards induction, followed by optional interviews. Investigators aim to recruit approximately 82 pregnant women and 20 to 30 clinicians (including midwives, obstetricians, and trainees) working in the maternity department at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

The investigators are developing a non-invasive breath test to help us detect pancreatic cancer earlier. The test detects small molecules called volatile organic compounds that are made by pancreatic cancers. Pancreatic cancer is a rare disease but patients are often diagnosed at a late stage because their symptoms are the same as those of many common illnesses. This makes it hard for doctors to know which patients need to be tested for pancreatic cancer. If the investigators find pancreatic cancer at a late stage, it reduces the number of treatment choices for patients. Our test could be offered to patients who are experiencing vague symptoms, which might be caused either by pancreatic cancer or a common illness. This test could help doctors to identify which of those patients may have pancreatic cancer, and ensure they get referred for specialised pancreatic cancer tests. The investigators hope that this will allow us to diagnose pancreatic cancer earlier, increasing treatment choices for patients and improving survival from pancreatic cancer. The investigators have previously conducted a study (VAPOR1) which collected breath samples from people with and without pancreatic cancer. When the investigators analysed these samples, they found that there is a difference in the volatile organic compounds breathed out by people who have pancreatic cancer compared to those that do not. The investigators used these 'markers' to develop a breath test to diagnose pancreatic cancer. In VAPOR2, the investigators will study our breath test in a much larger group of patients who have been referred for further investigations for potential underlying pancreatic cancer to see how accurately it can pick up the small percentage of people who have pancreatic cancer.

Patients with early pancreatic cancer often have symptoms that could also be caused by many common benign conditions, or no symptoms at all. Jaundice, weight loss and pain are 'red flag' symptoms of pancreatic cancer that are linked to incurable disease. At the moment only patients with 'red flag' symptoms are urgently referred for diagnostic testing to find out if they have the cancer. As a result, late diagnosis is a common feature of pancreatic cancer. This leads to limited treatment options being available to patients by the time they are diagnosed, and ultimately results in poor survival rates. There is a clear need to improve earlier detection of pancreatic cancer so that patients with pancreatic cancer can be identified earlier and faster, enabling them to start treatment more quickly. The study team is developing a non-invasive breath test that detects small molecules called volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that may be altered by pancreatic cancers. For patients with non-specific symptoms, this test would help general practitioners (GPs) to identify those patients that may indeed have an underlying pancreatic cancer, who would benefit from referral for specialised pancreatic cancer tests.

Cardiac MRI (CMR) scanning allows doctors to create detailed images of the heart. However, the need for experienced cardiac radiographers to perform each scan can make CMR's delivery difficult, and some patients in the UK wait more than half a year for a scan. These radiographers must take pictures of different part of the heart, termed "views", each of which must be precisely positioned. The investigators believe they can revolutionise CMR, by using artificial intelligence to automatically position the views so radiographers can focus on more difficult tasks. The investigators have used a retrospective database of pseudonymised (anonymised and linked) CMR scans at our hospital to create these artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, and they have validated them retrospectively on previous studies. The investigators now wish to test the algorithms prospectively. In this study, the investigators will recruit patients undergoing clinical CMR scans. In addition to the routine images acquired by expert radiographers, the investigators will require a duplicate set of images, positioned and planned by the AI algorithms. The investigators will then compare, within each patient, the AI-planned and expert-radiographer-planned scanning in terms of both speed and image quality.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether a wearable biofeedback smartbelt system can improve pain and disability in adults with chronic lower back pain. The intervention combines a wearable belt that measures muscle activity with a mobile application that provides real-time feedback during exercise. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the MMG-biofeedback system improve disability, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), compared to standard care alone over an 8-week period? * Does the system reduce perceived pain levels and improve exercise adherence in individuals with lower back pain over an 8-week period? Researchers will compare participants receiving the MMG-biofeedback belt alongside standard care to those receiving standard care alone to determine whether the addition of real-time muscle activation feedback leads to improved outcomes. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (biofeedback system + standard care) or control group (standard care only) * Complete an 8-week home-based exercise programme, all participants are asked to complete the programme at least 5 times a week * Use the wearable belt and mobile application during exercise sessions (intervention group only) * Receive a booklet with the exercise programme and video links (control group only) * Complete questionnaires on pain, disability, and usability at baseline and after 8 weeks, and at a 3-month follow-up * Have their exercise adherence and engagement monitored throughout the study The study includes an initial pilot phase to assess feasibility, followed by a larger randomised controlled phase to evaluate early clinical effectiveness.

This experimental medicine study aims to compare immune responses in healthy adult volunteers aged 18-55 years against influenza vaccination and infection in the upper and lower respiratory tract, following administration of a live-attenuated influenza vaccine delivered by nasal spray versus influenza A (H3N2) viral challenge.

Over 20,000 patients a year in the UK get surgery or radiotherapy to cure their prostate cancer. These men then undergo regular check-ups to manage potential side effects and see if cancer recurs so it can be treated quickly. The organisation of these check-ups varies across the country as it is not known which approach is best. The four different established approaches are (i) check-ups performed in hospital outpatients by the same team that provided treatment; (ii) patients seen regularly by their GP with hospital referral as necessary; (iii) planned shared care between general practice and hospital follow up; or (iv) patients supported to provide checks on themselves (self-care) and reaching out to a doctor or a nurse when required. This study will compare these options to establish which is best for patients and makes the best use of the NHS resources.

The goal of this study is to examine exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) caused by a common cold virus called rhinovirus, to identify new treatments. Exacerbations are flare-ups of respiratory symptoms which are a major cause of ill health in people with COPD, and are most commonly caused by viruses. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * What processes in the body occur in response to rhinovirus infection, and do the differences between people with COPD and healthy volunteers explain why people with COPD develop more severe illness and exacerbations? * Can treatments be identified that target these processes to reduce the severity and frequency of exacerbations in people with COPD? The study will compare eligible participants with COPD to healthy volunteers, and will involve intentionally infecting each participant with rhinovirus in a controlled environment. They will undergo baseline investigations prior to infection including a first bronchoscopy. Post-infection each participant will undergo a range of tests, including a second bronchoscopy, to compare how processes in the body, and especially the lungs, differ between people who do and do not have COPD.

PREM-IMPACT is a UK-based observational study exploring how caring for a very premature baby-particularly one affected by necrotising enterocolitis (NEC)-impacts families over the first year after hospital discharge. NEC is a serious bowel disease that can occur in premature babies, often requiring surgery and prolonged hospitalisation. This study runs alongside the WHEAT International Trial, which investigates whether pausing or continuing milk feeds during blood transfusions affects the risk of NEC in very preterm babies. PREM-IMPACT acts as a nested economic evaluation of the WHEAT Trial, helping to understand whether different feeding practices around transfusion offer good value for money from both the NHS and family perspective. PREM-IMPACT will collect detailed data on babies' health-related quality of life, as well as the financial, emotional, and social impact on parents and siblings. Families are recruited from neonatal units when their baby is ready to go home and complete questionnaires at three timepoints: 1) just before discharge, 2) six months later, and 3) twelve months later. Questionnaires cover health, wellbeing, healthcare use, and costs to the family (such as travel, time off work, or extra care needs). A dedicated research nurse based at the lead NHS site helps coordinate follow-up centrally. By studying families of babies with and without NEC, this project aims to clarify the burden of prematurity and NEC on infant outcomes and family wellbeing. The results will inform future policy decisions, including whether pausing or continuing milk feeds during transfusion should be adopted in routine neonatal care.

The goal of this intervention study is for patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer, to demonstrate that use of regular MRI scans is better able to detect cancer progression over 5 years compared to the current NICE defined strategy. Research Question P - In patients who are on active surveillance for low to medium risk prostate cancer, I - is the use of regular MRI scans C - compared to current NICE defined standard of care, O - better at detecting cancer progression with less cost to the NHS (fewer PSA tests, biopsies and clinic visits)? Patients will be allocated in a 1.1 ratio to either MRI scans or the current NICE defined standard. Randomisation will be blocked (random block size) and stratified by MRI visibility of lesions (3 categories \[ no visible lesion, diffuse changes, discrete visible lesion\]), cancer Grade Group (GG1, GG2) and time since diagnosis. This study will not be blinded to patients or physicians.

Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a progressive condition of the elderly that results in severe disability. iNPH can dramatically respond to Cerebral spinal fluid(CSF)-shunting where excess ventricular fluid is diverted from the brain. Not all patients with iNPH respond to CSF-shunting however. The reasons for this are uncertain. Aim 1: To understand if specific nerve pathways (white matter tracts) that are near ventricles are damaged in patients that respond to shunting as opposed to those that do not. Aim 2: Can we explain shunt non-responsiveness by screening for dementia like illnesses (neurodegeneration) using a large array of methods. Aim 3: To understand whether wearable activity and bed sleep monitors are palatable in a NPH population and to understand if these metrics relate to quality of life. Aim 4: To see whether self-administered digital cognitive assessments can measure improvements pre and post surgery.

Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide and is responsible for an estimated 9.6 million deaths yearly. Cancer-related deaths can be reduced if patients are diagnosed and treated early. Delay in cancer diagnosis can occur at any point along the diagnostic spectrum, from the first observation of symptoms to the start of treatment. Diagnosing cancer when it is still at an early stage, before it has spread, gives surgery, radiotherapy and other treatments the best chance of working. Therefore, early diagnosis is the most important way to improve cancer outcomes.Most of the cancers usually presents with vague and non-alarming symptoms. Most individuals are diagnosed late when the cancer has already spread, and the prognosis is poor. There are over 200 different types of cancer that can cause many different signs and symptoms. Sometimes symptoms affect specific body areas, such as abdomen or skin. But signs can also be more general, and include weight loss, tiredness (fatigue) or unexplained pain. The type of symptoms varies from person to person. The major reasons for not presenting to the GP with symptoms such as these are "not wanting to waste the GP's time" and normalisation of these symptoms. The persistence of a symptom, social influence and awareness encourage help-seeking behaviours in primary care. However, few believe their symptom(s) might be a sign of cancer. Consequently, people might choose to self-manage their symptoms by using over-the-counter medication, and to seek advice from other sources, (pharmacists, family, internet), rather than a primary care physician. RATIONALE FOR CURRENT STUDY An early cancer diagnosis is essential for receiving treatment as early as possible to have the best chance for successful treatment. Early diagnosis of cancer can be challenging. Sometimes, the cancer symptoms resemble common illnesses and could resolve with the use of over-the-counter medications and other remedies until they become persistent or debilitating. The present study focuses on ten cancer forms: colon, oesophageal, stomach, liver, bladder, uterine, vulval, ovarian, endometrial and pancreatic. Patients diagnosed with the cancers mentioned above often report experiencing vague symptoms (such as abdominal or back pain, indigestion, feeling full etc). They often use over-the-counter medication to manage their symptoms before seeing a doctor. Information about how often and what products participants purchase (e.g. pain killers, digestive products and natural remedies) to care for these symptoms could help identify these cancers a few crucial weeks or months earlier and encourage people to seek help sooner from their doctors.

Individuals attending the hospital to undergo operations are at risk of developing blood clots in the legs, known as deep vein thrombosis (DVT). A clot in the leg can cause swelling, pain, and other long-term problems. If a clot in the leg breaks off and travels to the lungs, it can cause problems with the lungs' ability to move oxygen from the air into the blood and may be life-threatening. This is known as pulmonary embolism (PE). DVT and PE are known collectively as venous thromboembolism or VTE. The importance of preventing VTE in surgical patients is widely recognised, with two main strategies used: thinning the blood with regular injections and/or tablets and wearing elastic stockings to help stop blood from sitting in the leg veins where it can clot. Evidence for using elastic stockings to prevent VTE has recently been challenged. Additionally, there is a lack of evidence for the additional benefit of stockings over and above that of blood thinning medications. If stockings were to reduce VTE over and above blood thinning medication, these benefits need to be weighed against the risks and disadvantages of stockings, including discomfort, restricting blood flow to the leg causing blisters and wounds in addition to the cost. If stockings were found not to reduce the risk of clots, they would no longer need to be used in these patients, thus reducing the disadvantages of stockings, and saving the NHS millions of pounds per year. Certain types of operations (300,000 per year in the UK) are linked with a particularly high risk of VTE, including cancer surgery, surgery in the abdomen and pelvis, and bone (orthopaedic) surgery. In these cases, patients are offered blood thinning medications both during their hospital stay and for a period after they have left the hospital. Furthermore, these patients are offered stockings to wear while in the hospital. It is not known if, in patients who receive blood thinning medications both in hospital and after discharge, the addition of wearing stockings whilst in hospital reduces their risk of VTE any further. The purpose of this study is to investigate if it is worthwhile using stockings, in addition to blood thinning medication, to reduce blood clots after surgery. People enrolled in the study will be those at the highest risk of VTE and require an extended period of medication to reduce the risk of a blood clot. A computer will randomly choose one of the below treatments by chance to make the trial fair: A) Extended duration clot-reducing medicine in addition to stockings B) Extended duration clot-reducing medicine alone The surgery and all the other medical care will continue as normal. Everyone in the study will get an ultrasound scan at 21 - 35 days after their operation to check if they have developed a blood clot. This is an additional scan, not routinely performed in the NHS, to make sure that all blood clots are detected at an early stage. Participants will receive a phone call at 7, 21-35 and 90 days after their treatment to see if they have developed a blood clot or had any problems with the treatment.

To determine whether changes in endothelial cell dysfunction are associated with changes in total pulmonary resistance in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the factors which determine how well ventricular tachycardia (VT) is tolerated. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What impact does coronary artery disease have on the ability for a patient to tolerate VT? 2. Does treatment of coronary artery disease with stents improve the tolerability of VT? Participants who are undergoing a clinically indicated coronary angiogram or coronary angioplasty procedure will have measurements of blood pressure, coronary pressure and coronary flow made during pacing at a range of heart rates.

This is a pilot study to investigate serum prednisolone profiles in: * Patients on high doses of prednisolone for any inflammatory disorder, both in the acute and chronic setting. * Patients stepping up from or down to prednisolone therapy in association with a course of high dose methyl-prednisolone or dexamethasone. The study will comprise 3 groups, including those started on high doses of prednisolone acutely in an inpatient or outpatient setting, participants on chronically high doses, and those receiving a several week course of high dose methylprednisolone or dexamethasone. The study aims to measure prednisolone levels at a number of time points to investigate serum profile differences in those receiving prednisolone acutely compared with longer term steroid use. Further samples will be taken to characterise additional metabolic changes.