Clinical trials

Kidney stones that are large or complex are often treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy, also called PCNL. Standard PCNL uses a larger access tract and is effective for removing complex kidney stones, but it may be associated with more bleeding, pain, and recovery burden. Modified mini-PCNL uses a smaller access tract and may reduce surgical trauma while maintaining a similar stone clearance rate. This multicenter randomized trial will compare modified mini-PCNL using a 20 Fr access sheath with standard PCNL using a 24 Fr access sheath in adults with complex renal stones. About 1,380 participants from 8 urology centers will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two procedures. The main purpose of the study is to determine whether modified mini-PCNL is not worse than standard PCNL in achieving stone-free status shortly after surgery. Stone-free status will be assessed by low-dose noncontrast CT within 72 hours after surgery. The study will also compare stone-free status at 3 months, complications, operation time, length of hospital stay, need for additional procedures, and quality of life.

This multicenter prospective cohort study will enroll adults who have undergone resection of a primary pulmonary nodule and have residual multiple pulmonary nodules or require routine postoperative pulmonary nodule follow-up. During clinically indicated follow-up visits, a small amount of peripheral venous blood will be collected at the same time as routine blood draws for research CyTOF immune phenotyping and viral imprinting-related serology. The study will not assign participants to treatment, change follow-up schedules, imaging, medication, surgery, or other clinical care. Research laboratory results will not be returned to participants or entered into medical records. The study will describe longitudinal peripheral immune-cell profiles and explore associations among T/B/NK cell phenotypes, T-cell differentiation and senescence/exhaustion markers, viral imprinting markers, and postoperative residual or new pulmonary nodule evolution.

This multicenter prospective cohort study will enroll adults who have undergone resection of a primary pulmonary nodule and have residual multiple pulmonary nodules or require routine postoperative pulmonary nodule follow-up. During clinically indicated follow-up visits, a small amount of peripheral venous blood will be collected at the same time as routine blood draws for research CyTOF immune phenotyping and viral imprinting-related serology. The study will not assign participants to treatment, change follow-up schedules, imaging, medication, surgery, or other clinical care. Research laboratory results will not be returned to participants or entered into medical records. The study will describe longitudinal peripheral immune-cell profiles and explore associations among T/B/NK cell phenotypes, T-cell differentiation and senescence/exhaustion markers, viral imprinting markers, and postoperative residual or new pulmonary nodule evolution.

This study will compare an intelligent pulmonary function exercise device with usual care and natural recovery in patients recovering from lung cancer surgery. After lung cancer surgery, many patients have reduced lung function, shortness of breath, lower exercise tolerance, and a risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Standard care usually includes postoperative nursing, pain control, coughing and sputum clearance instruction, early mobilization, discharge education, and routine follow-up. However, patients often lack structured guidance, feedback, and monitoring after discharge. Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will use an intelligent pulmonary function exercise device for respiratory training during hospitalization and at home until 30 days after surgery. The prescribed training is two sessions per day, with each session including 30 expiratory training repetitions and 30 inspiratory training repetitions. The device records training completion and related training information and provides reminders and feedback. The other group will receive usual perioperative care, standard discharge education, and natural recovery follow-up without a study-specified respiratory training device or training prescription. The main purpose of the study is to determine whether the intelligent pulmonary function exercise device improves recovery of forced expiratory volume in 1 second, or FEV1, from before surgery to 30 days after surgery. The study will also evaluate lung function at 90 days, symptoms, quality of life, walking capacity, training adherence, and postoperative complications.

This is a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study enrolling approximately 4,000 subjects across about 50 centers, including patients with COPD (confirmed and suspected), asthma (confirmed and suspected), bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease (ILD), upper airway obstruction (UAO), and healthy controls. Participants will undergo standardized clinical assessments, cough search, FENO, ETCO2, impulse oscillometry, spirometry, and/or bronchodilator test, and/or bronchoprovocation test, and/or diffusion capacity test at a single baseline visit, with no investigational intervention or treatment assignment. The primary objective is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of portable impulse oscillometry in Chronic respiratory diseases and to develop an artificial intelligence diagnostic model for COPD based on oscillometry. The study duration per subject is limited to the screening/baseline visit, with no follow-up visits planned.

This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI)-guided postoperative recovery management system in patients after lung cancer surgery. Eligible patients will be enrolled after surgery when their clinical condition is stable and will be randomly assigned to either an AI-guided recovery management group or a usual postoperative care group. Patients in the AI-guided group will receive usual postoperative care plus a multimodal AI-based recovery management system. The system will collect patient-reported symptoms, vital signs, physical activity, respiratory rehabilitation information, recovery-related data, and, when needed, wound or chest-related images or short videos. Based on these data, the system will provide recovery feedback, general nursing advice, respiratory rehabilitation reminders, activity guidance, and risk stratification alerts. For red-flag symptoms or high-risk conditions, the system will advise patients to contact the clinical team or seek medical care. Patients in the usual-care group will receive standard postoperative management after lung cancer surgery and will complete symptom assessments at the same prespecified time points, but they will not receive AI-generated individualized recovery feedback or AI-generated risk alerts. The primary outcome is the number of MDASI-LC-derived target symptom threshold events within 30 days after surgery. Target symptoms include pain, fatigue, disturbed sleep, shortness of breath, and cough. Secondary outcomes include overall target symptom burden, quality of recovery, time to recovery to a mild-symptom state, functional interference, respiratory rehabilitation adherence, physical activity adherence, unplanned healthcare utilization, pulmonary complications, and unplanned readmission.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lifei Qingchang Granules in the treatment of patients with stable bronchiectasis. This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Researchers plan to enroll a total of 150 adult participants (aged 18-75) who have been diagnosed with stable bronchiectasis and experience at least one acute exacerbation in the past 12 months. Participants will be randomly assigned into two groups in a 1:1 ratio: * The treatment group will receive Lifei Qingchang Granules along with standard postural drainage therapy. * The control group will receive a matching placebo along with standard postural drainage therapy. The treatment period will last for 3 months. The main goal is to see if the treatment can improve patients' respiratory symptoms and overall quality of life.

Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases remain a major clinical challenge. Although EGFR-TKIs have demonstrated intracranial activity, disease control is still suboptimal in some patients. Limertinib (ASK120067) is a novel third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor with favorable central nervous system penetration and encouraging intracranial antitumor activity. The potential synergistic effect of limertinib combined with radiotherapy warrants further investigation. This prospective, multicenter, single-arm phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line limertinib combined with radiotherapy in this patient population.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a predefined hybrid treatment strategy in patients with multiple pulmonary nodules who require surgical management of at least one dominant lesion. The strategy combines robot-assisted CT-guided percutaneous ablation and/or localization with non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (NiVATS) performed during the same hospitalization. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Is the hybrid treatment strategy associated with an acceptable rate of perioperative serious complications? Can the planned combination of robot-assisted percutaneous intervention and NiVATS be completed successfully in a real-world clinical setting? Participants will: Undergo preoperative evaluation and multidisciplinary assessment; Receive robot-assisted CT-guided percutaneous ablation and/or localization for selected pulmonary nodules; Undergo non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for resection of the dominant pulmonary lesion; Be followed for perioperative outcomes and short-term recovery up to 30 days after surgery.

This is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at a single center. The study aims to evaluate whether a "tubeless" strategy can enhance recovery for patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracoscopic sublobar resection (wedge or segment resection) for small lung nodules. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: * The experimental group will receive the "tubeless" strategy, which includes non-endotracheal intubation anesthesia (using a laryngeal mask) and no routine chest tube drainage after surgery. * The control group will receive the traditional strategy, which includes double-lumen endotracheal intubation anesthesia and routine chest tube drainage. The main goal is to compare the rate of achieving high-quality fast-track recovery at 24 hours after surgery between the two groups. This study will provide evidence on whether the tubeless approach can help patients recover faster and more comfortably without compromising safety.

This is a large clinical study that compares two different types of anesthesia for patients undergoing a specific kind of minimally invasive lung surgery (thoracoscopic sublobar resection) to remove small, early-stage lung nodules. The study aims to find out if a newer anesthesia method, known as "non-intubated anesthesia" (where patients breathe on their own with the help of a laryngeal mask airway and nerve blocks for pain control), is as safe as the traditional "intubated anesthesia" (which uses a breathing tube and a machine to breathe for the patient). The main goals of the study are, in order: 1. Safety First: To confirm that the non-intubated method does not lead to more lung complications within 30 days after surgery compared to the traditional method. 2. Effectiveness: If it is proven safe, the study will then check if patients receiving the non-intubated anesthesia have a better quality of recovery in the first 24 hours after surgery (e.g., less pain, fewer side effects like a sore throat, and a faster return to normal activities). Approximately 1600 patients from multiple hospitals will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to receive one of the two anesthesia methods. Neither the patients nor the surgeons will be told which group the patient is in when assessing the main outcomes after surgery, to ensure the results are fair and unbiased. The results of this study will provide high-quality evidence to help doctors and patients choose the best and most comfortable anesthesia option for this type of lung surgery.

Brief Summary The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and recovery outcomes of different tubeless strategies in adult patients undergoing uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) wedge resection who are confirmed to have no persistent air leak intraoperatively. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does double intraoperative aspiration tubeless strategy reduce the rate of postoperative pleural re-intervention within 30 days compared with single intraoperative aspiration tubeless strategy? Do different intraoperative pleural space management strategies affect early postoperative recovery quality and pain? If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare conventional chest tube drainage, single intraoperative aspiration tubeless, and double intraoperative aspiration tubeless strategies to determine their effects on postoperative pleural re-intervention and recovery outcomes. Participants will: Undergo uniportal VATS wedge resection Receive a standardized intraoperative air leak test before chest closure Be randomly assigned intraoperatively to one of three pleural space management strategies Complete postoperative assessments including chest imaging, pain evaluation, and recovery quality questionnaires Be followed for 30 days after surgery for safety outcomes

The goal of this prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical study is to learn whether a spontaneous breathing-preserving perioperative management strategy can improve recovery and is safe in lung transplant recipients with very low body weight (body mass index \[BMI\] \<16 kg/m²). The main questions it aims to answer are whether, in lung transplant recipients with very low body weight (BMI \<16 kg/m²), a spontaneous breathing-preserving anesthesia-surgical strategy combined with standardized nutritional optimization and a prehabilitation program can improve early postoperative recovery and perioperative survival. Specifically, the study will assess the proportion of participants who require postoperative invasive mechanical ventilation, postoperative length of hospital stay, and perioperative survival within the protocol-defined time window (e.g., through hospital discharge). Participants will undergo lung transplantation using a perioperative strategy that preserves spontaneous breathing whenever clinically appropriate, with predefined criteria for conversion to endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation if needed. They will receive standard postoperative monitoring and supportive care, with respiratory support events and perioperative complications assessed during the index hospitalization (and up to 30 days after surgery, if specified in the protocol). Key outcomes will be collected from routine clinical care, including postoperative ventilatory support status, length of hospital stay, and major safety events.

The goal of this prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical study is to learn whether a breathing-preserved anesthesia-surgical strategy can improve early recovery and perioperative survival in adults undergoing rescue/bridge lung transplantation. The main questions it aims to answer are whether, in adult rescue lung transplant recipients, a breathing-preserved anesthesia-surgical strategy can improve early postoperative recovery and perioperative survival, with a focus on the need for postoperative invasive mechanical ventilation, postoperative length of hospital stay, and perioperative survival outcomes. Participants will undergo lung transplantation using a standardized breathing-preserved anesthesia-surgical pathway, with predefined criteria for conversion to endotracheal intubation and/or initiation or escalation of extracorporeal support when clinically necessary. Participants will receive standardized perioperative care per each participating center's transplant pathways and will be followed from screening through hospital discharge and up to 30 days after surgery. Routine perioperative data and key postoperative outcomes, including major complications (e.g., graft dysfunction, respiratory support events, infections, bleeding requiring re-intervention, acute kidney injury, rejection, and thrombotic events), will be collected.

The goal of this prospective, multicenter, single-arm cohort study is to learn whether a lung transplantation approach that preserves patients' spontaneous breathing during surgery can improve early recovery in adults aged 70 years and older undergoing allogeneic lung transplantation. The main questions it aims to answer are whether, in adult lung transplant recipients aged 70 years and older, an anesthesia-surgical strategy designed to preserve spontaneous breathing is associated with better early postoperative recovery, specifically in terms of the need for postoperative invasive mechanical ventilation, postoperative length of hospital stay, and perioperative survival. Participants will undergo lung transplantation using a standardized anesthesia-surgical strategy intended to preserve spontaneous breathing, with predefined criteria for conversion to tracheal intubation and/or ECMO if clinically needed. They will receive standardized perioperative management and routine postoperative care (including ICU monitoring, rehabilitation, and recovery support) as determined by the transplant team. Participants will be assessed throughout hospitalization and followed for postoperative complications and outcomes through discharge and up to 30 days after surgery.

The goal of this study is to learn whether a spontaneous-breathing ("tubeless") anesthesia and surgery strategy can improve early recovery and remain safe for adults who receive a lung transplant. This strategy aims to help lung transplant recipients maintain spontaneous breathing as much as possible during and after surgery, avoid tracheal intubation with invasive mechanical ventilation and deep sedation, and thereby support faster recovery while maintaining postoperative survival and safety. All participants will receive lung transplantation supported by the same spontaneous-breathing ("tubeless") strategy. Researchers plan to enroll about 110 participants at several hospitals in China. A separate study team will review the main outcomes using predefined study rules. The main questions this study aims to answer are: The main questions this study aims to answer are: among adult lung transplant recipients, does an anesthesia-surgical strategy that preserves spontaneous breathing improve early postoperative recovery while remaining safe during the first 30 days after surgery? The study will focus on the need for postoperative invasive mechanical ventilation, length of postoperative hospital stays, and in-hospital mortality. Participants will: Complete screening tests and assessments before surgery (up to about 30 days before the transplant). Undergo lung transplantation using a standardized approach that aims to keep spontaneous breathing function, often using a laryngeal mask airway instead of a breathing tube. Receive pain and cough control measures (such as local anesthesia or nerve block anesthesia) and close monitoring during and after surgery. Receive standard postoperative care. If safety concerns arise, the clinical team will use invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation when needed. Be followed during the hospital stay and for 90 days after surgery to record recovery, complications, and readmissions.

The study enrolled patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring HER2 mutations, amplification, or overexpression who had progressed after ≥1 prior lines of anticancer therapy. After enrollment, participants received treatment with rezetamab plus pertuzumab until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or other conditions requiring treatment discontinuation.

This open-label, single-arm study is designed to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of NK010 cell injection combined with a PD-1 antibody and platinum-based chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study aims to assess the safety profile, feasibility of administration, and potential antitumor activity of this combination regimen.

This study is a single-arm clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of golidocitinib in patients with refractory, immune-related hematologic toxicity in advanced lung cancer.

This is a prospective, single-center, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the perioperative safety and feasibility of non-intubated spontaneous ventilation anesthesia (NIV) compared to conventional intubated mechanical ventilation anesthesia (IMV) in patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The study will be conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and aims to assess whether the non-intubated approach can offer comparable or better outcomes in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications, anesthetic drug consumption, recovery parameters, and overall postoperative rehabilitation. Eligible patients aged 18 to 75 years with resectable middle or lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma (stage I-III) will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either NIV using a laryngeal mask airway or IMV with a double-lumen endotracheal tube. Both groups will undergo the same thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgical procedures, and anesthesia will be managed with standardized protocols. The primary outcome is the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, including hypoxemia, hypercapnia, respiratory failure, and the need for conversion to intubation. Secondary outcomes include anesthetic drug dosage, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, postoperative pain scores, time to ambulation, length of hospital stay, and 30-day readmission rate. This trial complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrollment.

To evaluate the impact of herpes zoster vaccine on the incidence of herpes zoster and survival in lung cancer patients, and to explore its preventive effect and safety.

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nebulized inhalation of Recombinant Human Ad-p53 Injection (Gendicine®) for the treatment of multiple ground-glass lung nodules. This is a single-arm, open-label clinical study conducted at The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University in China. We plan to enroll approximately 38 patients who have been diagnosed with multiple ground-glass nodules. All participants in this study will receive the nebulized Gendicine® treatment. After the treatment, we will monitor changes in the nodules through regular chest CT scans and record any potential treatment-related reactions to determine if this novel therapy is safe and effective. This study has been approved by the hospital's Ethics Committee.

To evaluate the impact of the 23-valent pneumonia vaccine on the incidence of pulmonary infection and survival in lung cancer patients, and to explore its preventive effect and safety in the lung cancer patients.

A nationwide population-based multi-center RCT enrolling ≥60,000 eligible residents to compare screening effectiveness between risk-prediction-model-driven and traditional guideline-based high-risk lung cancer screening strategies.

AI diagnostic systems show great promise for improving lung cancer screening in community healthcare settings. While not originally designed for primary care, these tools demonstrate capabilities in nodule detection and workflow optimization. However, their effectiveness in resource-limited community centers requires thorough evaluation. This RCT compares AI-assisted versus manual CT interpretation across community health centers. Expert radiologists will establish reference standards, while an independent committee blindly evaluates cases from both groups. The study assesses diagnostic accuracy, operational efficiency, and cost-effectiveness, with blinded analysts resolving discrepancies through consensus to ensure reliable results.